this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
232 points (95.3% liked)

196

4816 readers
1574 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 100 points 1 week ago (3 children)

BTW it did not stop spinning. It just slowed down so much that relative to the mantle it was spinning in reverse. But relative to its own axis it is still spinning in the same direction.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 week ago

an important distinction, but come on that's not a good headline!

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it's like all the misleading headlines on inflation

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just checking to make sure we're on the same page. Were you expecting fetish porn, too?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is financial devastation a fetish

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but it's impolite to jerk off with your bankruptcy advisor unless you ask first.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you know what the impact of that is?

I'm sure it's fine; wasn't doing anything important

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The implications of this change in the inner core's movement for Earth's surface can only be speculated. Vidale said the backtracking of the inner core may alter the length of a day by fractions of a second:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240613161147.htm

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is that enough to be problematic for GNSS?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

No, the Earth's spin rate is always changing in very tiny ways and global positioning systems update regularly to account for this.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Article says it's so small it's likely lost in other variations, so it doesn't seem like it would be.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What does Bill Clinton have to do with the marked text?

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

A sex scandal involving Bill Clinton, the president of the United States, and Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern, erupted in 1998. Their sexual relationship began in 1995—when Clinton was 49 years old and Lewinsky was 22 years old—and lasted 18 months, ending in 1997.[1] Clinton ended televised remarks on January 26, 1998, with the later infamous statement: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton%E2%80%93Lewinsky_scandal

I guess Mandela effect with thinking it was "I did not have sexual intercourse..."?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 12 points 1 week ago

wow ok, that was a stretch

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren’t we due for a magnetic pole reversal? Would this be related?

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

They appear to be fully random so it's gamblers fallacy to say we're due for one, though this has been a very long gap without one. There don't seem to be extinction events associated with them regardless though so nbd hopefully.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Nice try Kerrigan, it's clear you're trying to trick the Terrans into not shielding our computers.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing in nature is fully random, just chaotic beyond our ability to model. Effectively random though? Yes, totally.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Realities of the uncertainty principle aside, the difference is academic when you look at chaotic phenomena.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I agree, but my pedantry knows no bounds!

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have good reason to believe quantum mechanics is truly random

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Bell Test rules out the possibility of a local hidden variable theory explaining quantum entanglement. That means the states of the two entangled particles are not simply unknown before measurement, they do not have independent states.

This means either, when you measure one particle it “instantaneously” affects the other, which has weird implications for causality because which particle is measured “first” can depend on your reference frame.

Or there is something statistical and truly random going on.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh I didn't mean to refer to hidden variables. I think there's just a fatal superfluence of available variables. Rather than an inability to know, the problem is an inability to know everything all at once.

The Bell Test is still a cool proof though.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No extinction events related, but it will fuck up the modern world for a good bit until we can adapt.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

To some degree maybe, to a massive degree maybe. It seems unlikely to happen on such a fast timescale that we couldn't respond to it though.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago