this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
137 points (82.5% liked)

Political Memes

1966 readers
636 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Self censorship is so cringe. Capitulating to the advertising overlords for nothing.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I dont think that this is self censoring... Honestly I first thought it was a shitpost...

I mean Nazi Germany was Germany occupied by Nazis not Germany...

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Why is "terrorist" crossed out?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

occupied

The definition when a regional gov is occupying that region is a very dubious line.

If a war-time president extends their term twice ~~(without elections)~~ & starts building concentration camps for his own citizens - is that "an occupation"?
(I'm talking about Roosevelt.)

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First of all... TIL ! Interesting!

And to get back To the discussion and reply to ya question.

Well maybe "occupation" is maybe not the right word for the Nazi problem back in the Day, but Germans tried to fight against their own regime even with weapons.. Isn't that kind a occupation?

Ad yeah people be like "they voted him, so they wanted him" feels also kinda shady when you see the historical records and compare them to todays US problems... Where a president tryies everything to stop their citizens to vote somebody he doesnt like...

Are there elections? Yes.

Do people in position of power try to manipulate the elections? Also yes!

I mean back in Nazi Germany you COULD vote, but took your right to vote without somebody seeing you who you are voting you were instanr suspicious...

Hope ya get what I am trying to say. I am not used to discuss such topics in English...

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, I didn't/don't disagree with the word, it's just that it entirely depends on the point of view (as opposed to more technical terms).

All regimes, "good" or "bad" have oppositions, folk were warning about Hitler way before rising to power, and indeed there were always fighters against him. But same as with "occupation" determining if those are "domestic terrorists" or "freedom fighters" (also dubious terms in their own) depends on your side/your views.

Hippies pretesting war (an actual occupation) in Vietnam got so demonized that there are still official (bs) policies in place in USA from that era.
USA citizens had nothing to benefit from all the anti-hippie propaganda, it was all for war profiteering, so in a sense that the gov wasn't working for the people, they were occupied.

Native Americans fighting against occupation & genocide are still branded as savages that attacked unprovoked. But had they won (somehow), that wouldn't be the case. Much like German "terrorists" that fought the regime aren't seen as that anyone (or even peaceful activists aren't seen as traitors anymore, eg the famous wiki/Sophie_Scholl).

A lot of demonstrations get branded that way too (eg against big oil). And get met with force.
That def feels like a justification that someone occupied the country/government.

A sort of occupation is also when politicians of a nation are hijacked by interests groups (megacorps, powerful geopolitical players, some cabal).
And you get situations where citizens overwhelmingly support an issue (75+%) but no politicians won' impellent it.

[–] Darnton@piefed.zip 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The heavy censorship on this image is so ironic.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

What censorship? I had to pee.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

Wait, I thought that only Germany making nazis illegal was the joke.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The censorship is so stupid I thought it was a normal image edited to try and make some kind of point.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

Whenever I see poorly covered words being censored, I believe the point is that censoring these words is stupid and it's being done ironically/sarcastically and isn't automatically removed by bots on corporate ran social media sites that have really stupid word filters.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is the word Nazi frowned upon by the advertisement police?

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 10 points 1 week ago

Yes it's from instagram

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

Funnily enough: "fascist" isn't.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

\why do p**ple cnsor everthng nwad*ys?

fuck lemmy for ruining my joke

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you like to order a couple of \?:

For only 9.99 you too can write comments like:

why do p**ple c*nsor ever*th*ng n*wad*ys?

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

where can i purchase? JUST TAKE MY MONEY 💸

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

nwad

Oh ... nvm, for a second there I thought you called me an n'wah ...

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

The fuck is going on there?