this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26418 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans got their midterms bogeyman in Zohran Mamdani. Now comes the challenge: making the incoming New York City mayor’s brand of democratic socialism sink candidates outside his liberal bubble. They’re getting right to it. Republicans’ House campaign arm launched digital ads Wednesday morning across 49 battleground districts tying Democrats to the “socialist mayor” who “built his movement on defunding the police and abolishing ICE.”

Archive article: https://archive.is/Ym8Za

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blave@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Not just this, but the entire idea of making groceries and rent a little bit more affordable is suddenly “communism”

This is a bunch of crazy bullshit spewed by Republicans to get you scared of doing the right thing and voting for this guy

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling "making things affordable" communism is how you convert people to communism.

[–] blave@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Ironically, true

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Well it's only different from the 50's in the sense that wealth disparity is beyond that of the 1920's and the current red scare doesn't have a preceding 20yrs of socialist reforms propping up the economic conditions for the laborers.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Given the outpouring of support nationwide for Mamdani, this feels like a bold move. If they misjudge the population, this could end up providing unprecedented support for these candidates rather than scaring people away from them.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully we can capture this moment in time and use the momentum to establish real progressives in high places.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A vote for Bart is a vote for Anarchy!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

A VOTE FOR BART IS A VOTE FOR ANARCHY!!!!!

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

abolishing ICE

Fuck yeah! Sign me up for whoever is saying that.

Republicans run straight to the lie factory instead of fixing shit they broke. Figures.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Two centrists win races for governor: crickets

One socialist wins a mayorship: "OMG! THE DEMOCRATS ARE ALL COMMUNISTS!!!"

...

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not to mention, they’ve been saying the democrats are all communists no matter who it is including Biden and Kamala so not sure what this is going to change.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's like their parents never told them the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s probably why democrats were afraid of endorsing Mamdani.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well, they were clearly idiots then, weren't they? Completely out of touch and having utterly misread the political moment. To be relegated to the dustbin. Valueless.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Let’s see if Mamdani does anything he said he will or if he just ends up being a Trump on the left before we start gloating.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What makes you think he’s a liar? One of Mamdani’s biggest wins in the assembly was getting the taxi drivers’ debt limited due to De Blasio using medallion prices to fill a budget shortfall.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s promised a lot plus he films iPhone videos vertical.

[–] Ixoid@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

Former television camera operator here - vertical videos used to annoy me, being used to shooting with a 16:9 widescreen canvas. But if 90% of your audience is watching your content on a phone screen, why WOULDN'T you shoot 9:16? Landscape video is only good for TVs and computer monitors. You know it makes sense.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No. Now we revel in how consistently and perpetually wrong your takes (conservative democrat/ moderate democrat) are.

How they are not predictive of anything, what-so-ever.

How the positions you advocate for persistently result in self-sabotage for Democrats.

No. Now we revel.

Now is when we make it clear to the "centrists" and "moderates" of the party that they are why fascism has risen in this country; and that there is a clear and functional antidote in the progressive movement.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s promised a lot so winning was just a tiny first step in his journey.

I think both of us can agree that we want a politician who’s not all lip service and doesn’t do anything.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that we've already won, because this was barely a fight for the office: it was primarily a fight to defeat the kind of cynicism that has repeatedly and persistently lost Democrats elections.

If and what gets done is materially secondary. There will be some W's, there will be some L's, but its functionally irrelevant, because quite literally nothing is possible when political cynicism is your guiding compass.

And its so, incredibly, obvious.

Our problem has never been whether or not idealistic goals can be achieved, its only ever been if we can overcome the cynicism, the utter fraudulence of "moderation" and "centrism" as political ideology. Its the hollowness of these political ideologies that has broken American politics. Trumpism, fascism, the fact that there are literal neo-nazis in government: these are a direct result of the political cynicism which has sat at the heart of the Democratic party since 1977.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If and what gets done is materially secondary. There will be some W's, there will be some L's, but its functionally irrelevant, because quite literally nothing is possible when political cynicism is your guiding compass.

This mentality is why I called him Trump on the left.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This mentality is why I called him Trump on the left.

And thankfully, we can finally bury this kind of toxicity, and point at the exact mentality, mindset, and political calculus you use as the very reason Democrats lose elections.

Its clear that you've never investigated your own mindset to its logical conclusion: that because nothing is guaranteed to be possible we shouldn't try.

But all that really matters now, moving forwards, is that we have the entire evidence set required to just dismiss your political identity outright. The utter void which this political perspective represents: we can clearly point at exactly what you think, and how you think it, as being why fascism has risen in this country.

And we now have everything we need to justifiably put you on the bench and make the positive argument that you need to be ignored. That you are harmful to democracies, because if you are listened to, fascism becomes inevitable.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What I’m saying is before you base your entire political identity on one guy maybe make sure that’s he’s worth backing.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

🗿🗿🗿