this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
266 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

2932 readers
336 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An engineer discovered that the manufacturer can remotely brick his smart vacuum for not collecting data.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It doesn't appear that anything is being done about this. I imagine there are many more devices pulling similar shit (sending personal data they collect back to their data centers without consent)... It just bothers me that there's doesn't seem to be any pushback whatsoever in cases like this. Not that i need or use a robot vac but I'm sure this type of data collection is hardly limited to them

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Even worse still, if you don’t allow them this intrusive data, they remotely brick the device you own.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There needs to be a law stating companies MUST notify you that "this product won't work if data collection is disabled" on the outside of the box

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Lol sure, "let them do whatever they want but it should be ILLEGAL not to write it on the box!"

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No no, I absolutely agree that shit like this shouldn't be allowed in the first place. But the issue is most people I've met genuinely do not care. They are okay with the amount of data being collected by their corporate overlords.

At the very least stating that a product won't work if it isn't connected to the internet allows consumers who do give a shit to know what type of product they're dealing with.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Corporate execs ought to go to prison for that.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

s/prison/the guillotine/

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It doesn’t appear that anything is being done about this.

Something has already been done about this: https://valetudo.cloud/

The "iLife" robot in the article is based on the 3irobotix CRL-200S, a "white label" unit that a bunch of brands sold as their own, up to and including Xiaomi, Viomi, Conga, Cecotec, Proscenic, and even Wyze. I have the Wyze version (the only one sold in the US), which will be getting Valetudo, but I kinda bricked it while attempting to root it. Luckily the motherboards are cheap, I picked up a "new" one for $15. Just waiting for it to show up.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a tidal wave. It's very hard to stop. The wave consists of about a trillion variables all pointing in the wrong direction.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bigboitricky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

iAmYourLife

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

iLife A11 smart vacuum

it had an AllWinner A33 SoC with a TinaLinux operating system, plus a GD32F103 microcontroller to manage its plethora of sensors, including Lidar, gyroscopes, and encoders.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't clean.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why didn't he just use DNS spoofing?

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"we didn't do it because it was easy, but because we though it would be easy"

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

And then we got angry because it didn't work and worked on it until 3am.

[–] bigboitricky@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it from there, I got it from r/programmerHumor (equally as destiguished imo /s)

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

Why do it the easy way, when you can do it the fun way?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

To quote the inventor of the Steam Brick:

Because I was so preoccupied with whether or not I could that I didn't stop to think if I should.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Kill who? Thats my question.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, it was my turn for the repost!