this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
739 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

8547 readers
1988 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A car does not randomly have a DUI device...

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Especially in Wisconsin. Our drunk driving laws are some of the most lax in the nation. There's a saying that the first DUI is free, and it's only kinda a joke.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pop over to Michigan and they permanently revoke your license for a second DUI.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

can't have shit in detroit

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you look at consumption rates it makes sense. Wisconsin is a powerhouse of drinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamacar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’ll tell the IRS to screw off. I’ll hit a lawyers car for fun. I will not fuck with the tavern league of Wisconsin.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Takes a whole lot of DUIs in Wisconsin. Probably years and years of consistently driving home drunk

Driving drunk is just an expected part of American life in most of the country. If it weren't, we'd have ways to get around other than by car

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Or maybe she's one of those dimwits who likes to annoy judges by asking them if they are following maritime or common law, and assert that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over them, and that they're not travelling, and that nobody was personally harmed...

It's impressive just how careful judges tend to be with these nutcases, which I suppose is because it's so far outside the rules of court, that they tend to play too safe and end up vindicating the whole clown show...

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Seriously, this isn't that sweet of a scene

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 33 points 2 weeks ago

It never pretended to be a sweet scene. It's basically just saying that wisconsinites are alcoholics.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not? Not a single person drove drunk that day

[–] Laser@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

At least not the car that has a DUI device installed. But considering the car is the primary method to get around in the States, some of the people in that story probably drove a car before and after

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's because they didn't include the part where she lands flat on her ass laughing when she realizes "this isn't even MY CAR you guys!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

Communities are stronger when they come together. Truly a inspiration to us all.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 28 points 2 weeks ago

It would have been fine. The tow truck also has a DUI lockout.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry who can translate this to a European?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The woman's car wouldn't start because of an installed device that makes her pass a breathalyzer (something courts can mandate). Midwestern people are stereotypically very helpful, but the ones from Wisconsin drink a lot, so nobody present could pass the breathalyzer either. The solution was for all the drunk strangers to physically push her car to where it needed to be.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 38 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

that's why you have sober balloons in the trunk

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Holy crap lol i hope people dont do that

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I had a friend in high school who's father was an alcoholic attorney, and he'd have his kids pass the breathalyzer for him every morning.

I actually bought a user 2001 S10 off them in 2004 with like 25k miles on it for only 3 grand because he'd keep rubbing along the side of in the driveway pulling in and out drunk, so it had a bunch of cosmetic damage that I didn't care about at all.

I drove that truck for 11 years.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s the best kind of S-10

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It was so scraped up people probably assumed it was a Dakota.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

He must've gotten lucky. The ones I've seen require you to blow every 10 minutes while driving. Dad would not have gotten all the way to work these days.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They're joking. Interlocks are more sophisticated than that. You're not going to fool one with a balloon. You have to inhale before exhaling, and a camera records a video of you blowing to make sure there's no funny business.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I've not seen one with a camera before but it would take multiple very large balloons, and a level of coordination that a drunk would not have.

You have to breathe out for a full 30s strong or it will error. It was suprisingly difficult. Then every 10 minutes while driving - it will beep and you have 2 minutes to blow into it or it flips out, and the car shuts off. You won't be able to turn it back on without contacting someone.

Source: My buddy's dad was an alcoholic. He'd have to go home early from playing so he could do the breathalyzer and ride along so his dad could take the car out anywhere. Sometimes he'd have to skip school to go to his dad's work.

Actually it's fucked up thinking about it now....

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Just checked, and I can only last thirty seconds at a rather feeble rate. Apparently the device is for people who trained their lung capacity in the childhood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks mate!

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

surprised they didn't still get a DUI for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated

y'know, what with cops giving them out to people sleeping it off in the back of their car and whatnot. somebody had to get in the car to put it in neutral

Cops don't catch most people.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The DUI device will let you shift into neutral? I thought usually you had to turn the key to get it into neutral.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be a safety hazard if it prevented you from shifting into neutral, for situations like this. Tow truck would have needed to put it in neutral as well

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tow trucks dont have to. If they cant tow it on a free axle, they'll just use dollys.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes but many cars also have a shift lock override that allows you to drop it in neutral, usually a small slot near the shifter knob the key will fit into. Dollys are only good for short distance and sometimes you need to get it on a bed.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 19 points 2 weeks ago

Depends on the car and device, but I think they usually disable the ignition, not the key turning.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Don't most cars also have the little hidden keyhole next to the shifter, specifically for this purpose?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No not specifically for a bunch of alcoholics to move a car under human power.

But yes most cars do have that.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, maybe not that specifically, but more generally, to move the car when it cannot, for whatever reason, move itself.

Even if that reason is alchohilism.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean it is pretty damn unlikely these days but it could be a stick

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have to have a breathalyzer device installed, you shouldn’t be allowed to drive

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Its crazy that a car is viewed as so integral to a persons ability to make a living that we have to allow these types of situations to happen.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Big 'ope energy.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's the Midwest I miss

load more comments
view more: next ›