this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
144 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

1966 readers
523 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It costs all telephony users money to receive texts. Even texts they don’t want they are still on the hook for. It’s not much, only about 6/10’s of a cent, but still. Every reply you send results in them being billed.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Make a script to bombard them with spam before they manage to block you

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Bee movie script, one letter at a time

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

I got spammed with an invitation to a local university where a politician would be speaking. I replied with “[name] is a loser” and got the same result!

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, can confirm, this does work.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Sure does, lmao.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

A lot of automated phone trees detect cursing or anger in the voice, I'm not surprised they do the same over text since it is simpler to do.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Schwarzenegger proving that he is, indeed, a Republican.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The sad part is that he is right. The law preventing gerrymandering is a good law. Its just that places like Texas don't have the same law and therefore they can just unilaterally gerrymander the shit out of their districts to virtually obliterate liberal voting blocks.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Got a text from these fucks this morning. Replied back "fuck off, traitor", "stop", then blocked them.

[–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

https://cadem.org/yes-on-proposition-50-faq/

Proposition 50 is a direct response to a Republican power grab orchestrated by President Trump and state leaders in Texas, who redrew Congressional district lines to gain five more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Proposition 50 proposes new lines for many of California’s 52 congressional districts, which would negate the five Republican seats drawn by Texas. Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

I'm pretty sure we're talking about gerrymandering, but beyond that this is completely confusing. How do states make more seats? Why will the new seats be Democrats? (As in, like, who decided that and how?) Will this just make it go back and forth all the time depending on who's in power at the moment, or is it actually fair? Is the independent districting commission corrupt?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

This specific instance of gerrymandering is to off-set Texas redistricting to add an additional 5 republican seats.

It has to be voted on because we (the state of California) have previously passed a law saying that any redistricting/gerrymandering must be mandated by the people. Otherwise they wouldn't even need to ask. They could just do it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

They mean it would (statistically) flip five seats to Dems. Which is actually gaining ten seats effectively in a hyper partisan environment by taking away five of theirs but whatever.

[–] TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Problem is, responding just confirms the number, so now they can sell a list of confirmed numbers and make money. Just delete or block... Never respond.

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 3 points 3 weeks ago

I wish this worked with my local far-right party as well

[–] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Kind of a lose-lose situation tbh

I understand how it can be a lesser evil when the other (less democratic) party is doing it, but "safe" seats are also terrible for the in-party competition. Yay to more status quo candidates from the dems.