this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
589 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 237 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you, too, can die at the hands of AI and become forever enshrined as algorithmic data to help improve Tesla's subscription services sales to the very wealthy and hostile

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 134 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Since it seems to be unsafe at any speed, why not.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because now it can hurt others going even faster

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 month ago (7 children)

When a self driving car breaks the law, the CEO should get the demerit points on their own licence, and if they lose their licence, the cars can't drive anymore.

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would be funny but better yet, the entire line of cars gets the feature deleted from them and customers are reimbursed the entire value of the car plus interest in exchange for having risked their lives testing an unstable and dangerous vehicle.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bail out the idiots that bought cybertrucks?

eehhhh.....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (22 children)

Just because Elon is above the law doesn’t mean you are, even if you’re in a Tesla. Good luck.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Even if you’re just minding your business when a sleeping pilled-out middle manager from Subway corporate plows into your 98 Corolla in their Tesla at 100 mph leaving your family without a father and source of income because a billionaire nazi who's constantly off his nut on ketamine decided rules are stupid and don’t apply to him and the entire societal structure designed to prevent this from happening has been hollowed out by incompetent bigots who absolutely rate high on the sociopath scale because nazi media has ensnared 51% of the population and now you dead.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with you but may I offer you a comma in these trying times?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

which comes with higher speeds and more frequent lane changes

Go kiss a concrete pillar, ya duds

[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why do we continue to allow this company to exist and break the law?

[–] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Adaptive cruise control is good enough for most people and has been a proven technology for 20+ years. FSD is just downright dangerous.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I like my car’s version that’s just adaptive cruise control combined with using lidar maps of major roads to do lane-centering. I can go on a road trip and not touch the gas, break, or steering wheel for hours, but I have to drive it myself through residential neighborhoods.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

"that breaks speed limits" can be ok.

I have seen a number of US interstates posted at 55mph, when traffic moves at 70-80mph. Being stuck at 55mph on those interstates is dangerous.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago

The fact that this FSD mode comes with “more frequent lane changes” means it isn’t just keeping up with traffic. It’s designed to go faster than traffic. Stop making herr Elon’s points for him.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago (36 children)

I do aknowledge that's always going to be the problem when we have the human + AI driver combinations.

Safest hypothetical is 100% AIs that always follow the same rules... next safest is humans that break the rules, but in a context aware situation (IE everyone going 70 in a 55, is safer than 1 car going 55 and all other cars going 70).

Real danger though is if the AI doesn't make good judgement calls when doing so. IE rather than deciding based on how fast other cars are going, it's primary determination is whether the user says they are in a hurry, leading it to sometimes be the one car going 55, but if the person is in a hurry it may be the only car going 70 on a road everyone else is going 55.

load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when Elon said how self driving would make roads safer?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So there’s finally a “New Jersey” mode.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And all the innocent people that get splattered in the process will just be chimps shot into space

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They didn't pay for the car, so why do they get a say right?

Sarcasm.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 month ago

states just need to ban teslas from public road

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Need jammers to confuse and break Teslas. They're weapons designed to break laws and protect occupants at the expense of bystanders. Can't be mad if a bystander redirects your Tesla into a ditch.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

protect occupants

It doesn't even do that. You crash a tesla and start a fire, it will glady lock you in the car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] greasewizard@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 month ago

I can't wait to get paralyzed by a cybertruck veering in to me at the highway

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Hurry mode" lol. I'm pretty sure every driving instruction manual ever made says something like "don't drive like you're in a hurry."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

This is the guy who decided traffic rules are dumb.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Next will be teslas without airbags. Because why not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I drive a Tesla. I live in Connecticut, speed limits are set very low and are ignored by just about everybody Including police, as long as you're not driving recklessly.

The problem with the latest FSD versions is they take precise speed control out of the driver's hands. In previous versions, you could manually set a maximum speed. Now you cannot, you only pick one of these driving profiles.

So for example if I'm driving on a 55 mph highway, and all the other cars are doing 75 mph, I have to pick the 'Hurry' profile which also hangs out in the left lane and makes a lot of lane changes and faster acceleration/braking. I would much rather drive standard style but with higher speed, but that isn't an option.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (23 children)

Why use FSD though if you would still need to pay attention and be ready to take over the car? I understand cruise control to a degree but the other stuff I dont see how its helpful to rely on a computer that can malfunction at any moment.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

I got a tesla and I don't fucking trust that shit to not slam me in to a barrier

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Spyware on wheels won't let me break the law

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Intentionally breaking laws sounds like something that should be prosecuted.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Teal@piefed.zip 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

With the exception of not being low cost items, Tesla blended with a little SpaceX could become Spacers Choice from The Outer Worlds.

"At Spacer's Choice, we cut corners so you don't have to”.

"It's not the best choice, it's Spacer's Choice”.

“Taste the freedom”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Dude can we get so much as a copyright violation from Warner Bros on this shit?

load more comments
view more: next ›