this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

5332 readers
216 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Admiral Rob Bauer, who serves as the principal advisor to NATO's secretary general, also said that nations supplying weapons to Kyiv have the right to limit their use.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/aZWt4

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.euronews.com%2F2024%2F09%2F15%2Fnato-chair-backs-ukraines-use-of-long-range-weapons-to-strike-inside-russia

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But was this ever a question? The problem was if they can use "gifted" weaponry for this purpose.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

By international law they can use weapons supplied by other nations even for long range strikes into Russia yes, to my knowledge it's just a gentleman's agreement that they follow the terms of the nation supplying them. Not really a point of contention though as it would be idiotic to violate those terms at risk of not being supplied anymore.

The only point of contention is whether supplying nations should decide to allow strikes into Russia with their equipment because Russia continues to threaten that it would see that as an act of war from the supplying nation. So legally nothing wrong with it but you have to weigh that decision with possibility of starting World War III or a nuclear apocalypse.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course they do. That's what happens when you invade someone, the someone you invade also hits back at you.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same applies for Palestinians, Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam. You'd be totally fine with that.

right? right?

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely! Imperialism is bad when Russia does it, and when American/Israel does it.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Nonono you're not supposed to have principles, you're supposed to just pick sides instead otherwise 'what about USA' won't work as a gotcha. Just think of the poor tankies, whatabout USA is all they have, would you really tankie that away from them?

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In fact this is basically the only way for the war to end. By capturing Russian territory Russia now has a reason to come to negotiations to just call everything off to get their land back.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Russia is just lucky the land is tied down or the farmers would have towed it back home...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every war is weird it's own way, but that thing is probably unprecedented. How can a war-torn country fight having one hand strapped to the back with a country having 4x it's population and resources? And still managing to resist after 2,5 to 10 years of warfare? Imagine that in fiction and you'd call it unbelievable.

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if it results in Russia retaliating against the west? Hopefully there's an end to it all before then

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two and a half years into a 3 day invasion and Russia wants to attack NATO countries in retaliation for Ukraine using weapons gifted to them at their full capabilities after themselves receiving additional weapons from Iran they use without restraint? It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for them.

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yea, I'm sure it won't work out for them, but you never know how desperate Putin can be. People say that he's crazy but not stupid, but to wage war against the west after struggling with Ukraine? Yea, it'd be a bold strategy indeed