this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
-4 points (25.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8339 readers
628 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As is stands, parents are able to claim their children as dependents on their tax returns, which lowers their overall tax liability and in effect means that the parents either pay less in taxes or receive a higher return at the end of each year.

Until they reach the age at which they can work, children are a drain on society. They receive public schooling and receive the same benefit from public services that adults do, yet they contribute nothing in return. At the point that they reach maturity and are gainfully employed and paying taxes, they become a functioning member of society.

If a parent decides to have a child, they are making a conscious decision to produce another human being. They could choose to get a sterilization surgery, use birth control, or abort the pregnancy (assuming they don't live in a backwards state that's banned it). Yet even if they decide to have 15 children, the rest of society has to foot the bill for their poor decisions until the child reaches adulthood.

By increasing taxes on parents instead of reducing them, you not only incentivize safe sex and abortion, but you shift the burden of raising a child solely to the individuals who are responsible for the fact that that child exists.

I am a strong advocate for social programs: Single-payer healthcare, welfare programs, low-income housing, etc, but for adults who in turn contribute what they can. A child should only be supported by the individuals who created it.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davemeech@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Unpopular as advertised, sure. But man, what an absolute weapons-grade bad take, with beginning to end poor reasoning.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Say what you will about humans on earth, annoying kids, etc.

But the state needs bodies. Kids are future workers, and they state wants healthy, capable workers. As such, tax credits are offered not as a prize to the parents, but an investment by the state. The state is hoping parents will have a bit more money for healthy food, housing and education for their kids, thus creating workers who are a bit healthier and more capable.

Human capital is a real thing, at a state level. Lose your input, and you'll grow weak.

You may not have had a perfect, or even good upbringing, but any tax credit your parent/guardian received didn't make it worse. If you did have a good upbringing, think of all the variables that went into that. Tax credits are a small part of that.

Upvote for using the sub correctly

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Upvoted because you're dead wrong, in my opinion. Your argument incentivizes the demise of the human race by saying "stop having kids to save money". Society is made up of generations. Get rid of the youngest generation, you remove humanity.

[–] Leg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The fact that there exists a mind who can think this is a good take has me deeply concerned for the future.

Upvote.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Until the age at which they can work, children are a drain on society

Just remember that after the age you can work, you will be a drain on other people's children.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Parents pay less in taxes because they've contributed a human to the system which will inevitably be taxed.

It's an incentive for procreation.

Frankly the incentive isn't good enough.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You’re assuming the child will eventually pay taxes.

[–] Ddinistrioll@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Unless you're in a country/state with no VAT/sale taxe, the child will inevitably pay taxes.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Ddinistrioll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm not from the US, but according to this source, only Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon don't have sale taxes. Which means, if I'm not mistaken, that at most only about 2.5% of the US population can realistically never pay taxes (percentage of us pop. per states from Wikipedia)

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The post was about federal income tax deductions.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only rich people should have children - that's a seriously unpopular opinion. Upvoted.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the whole eugenics thing was generally agreed to be bad, especially when enforced by economic class, but guess it's in fashion again, sort of like it was ~100 years ago?

[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eugenics is how we turned wolves into dogs and selectivity bred specific working instincts into them. It's how we bred disease resistant crop varieties or crops with heavier / larger fruits.

Wait, if it works everywhere else, surely it works on humans too?

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

We were not discussing whether it works.