this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
206 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26475 readers
1530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ging@anarchist.nexus 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alwayshasbeen.webp
What I'm more interested in is how we will rectify and interpret the past 10 years as a country with the objective fact so thoroughly aired out now.

Why in broad daylight are delusional cults rising to power in the nation that once was known to handle cults' dangers quite well without infringing on crucial freedoms such as 1st amendment and etc? How did we lose the way so rapidly immediately after setting a good precedent? Do I dare inquire about the future of such matters, too?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

New and arational beliefs seem to always proliferate at times at times of widespread cultural strain, especially when empires are starting to fall apart. Iconoclasm, the fists of righteous harmony and taiping christianity are the first examples I can think of.

I suspect it's (at least partly) an inevitable way that societies react to stress or change.

[–] Ging@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 months ago

This all seems to check out honestly. I guess I just struggle to believe the lack of resilience that's been demo'd. You are absolutely right though, the collapse is always faster than expected

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was it just me or did it seem like his wife was forcing herself to cry a little bit? Or like it was a rehearsal cry or something? It was really fucking off putting, like your husband just got shot in the neck, do you really need to be fake crying during your speech? Idk it seemed really creepy to me.

Like if that’s the way she cries sincerely then that’s also creepy.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you're going to do it, no half-measures, do it like a mob of Shi'as self-flagellating, bleeding all over the place and ululating to mourn the martyrdoms of 'Ali and Hussein.

The fact that the MAGAts aren't doing that is a sign that even they know it's a crock of shit.

And where are all the claims of miracles being performed in Kirk's name?