this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
345 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87879 readers
2479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it took them long enough. The container has been around for over 20 years now.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

WebM is just Mastroska with most features disabled that are not relevant to streaming and a mandated set of codecs, so basic Mastroska support would have been possible years ago, simply by accepting the Matroska MIME types.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Me to handbrake for two decades: stop trying to make MKV happen! It's not going to happen!

Guess I owe them an apology

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn’t know that was something that’s been available in Chrome. Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's highly popular in the anime scene for its ability to contain original audio and dubs and a few subtitle tracks, including custom fonts for some of the subtitle formats that are feeling particularly special.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that firefox actually supports any of those advanced sub formats lol (I’d be surprised if chrome did either though tbh)

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely true. But it's relatively easy, I assume, given that webm is just a subset of mkv anyway, and why not!

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It's the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hold up can someone please tell me what benefits MKV has over let's say MP4 ?

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Here is a pretty good write up on it. They aren’t that different but generally I think mkv is preferred in high quality since it can handle more tracks and more codecs.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

It supports more codecs and I believe can store more tracks compared to MP4. Whenever I download a high quality movie or tv show, especially if it has multiple audio tracks and subtitles to choose from, it is always packaged in .mkv

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

It supports more complicated subtitles and menuing, more codec support (like a LOT more) lossless support, mode audio formats.

It's like they took MP4 and added in all the stuff that you needed to replicate a BluRay, then added in lossless audio.

If you just want a movie with basic subtitles and audio, MP4 is fine. If you want to replicate newer stuff, MKV supports it.

The real hot part of this is if you have a collection of high-quality video/audio and you're streaming it to firefox, you'll natively be able to do so without transcoding.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

After all this time.

I was there before mp4 was a thing.

[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that's cool but I don't think I've ever seen a website that actually hosted MKVs. What are some websites that have MKVs?

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 30 points 1 year ago

Being able to direct stream content from jellyfin without needing to repackage on the fly to another container would be nice.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

After Firefox, by definition.

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've just been using the VLC plugin. 🤷‍♂️

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are several plugins to open in VLC.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Plugin or add on? I guess I'll have to search it. I would love to watch tvheadend streams in ff

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I think it's actually an extension. You're required to have VLC open for it to work.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Meh, too little too late

i am still gonna use MOV in obs if it's not a tower PC