this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

196

17484 readers
973 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
5
loss rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

There's even a proper stroke order

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

~~:.|:;~~

I can be trusted with this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

"first and only Kanji".

If English had other logograms, I 🤔 what they'd be?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

People forgetting about "&."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, no. It wouldn't be the first kanji of English. Kanji is the Japanese pronunciation of 漢字 (hanzi), where 漢 means han/China and 字 means character/letter. Ergo, it makes no sense to call it "the English language's first and only Chinese character."

If you need to use a Japanese word to describe this, then 絵文字 (e mo ji; picture, character/symbol) fits better, but we already have several words for that, like pictogram or pictograph. One could argue that smileys fall into this category as well. So perhaps it's a smiley.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I bet you're fun at parties

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Learning random cool stuff like this is part of why I like lemmy, and why I used to like reddit. Please don't shut down constructive contributions with low effort snark. And before you use your line on me, if I were fun at parties, I would get off lemmy and go to parties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

There is a difference between "btw etymological this used to mean that but since X we use it in other contexts as well" and "no, you are wrong". The difference is one is fun at parties, the other is not.