this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
1067 points (97.8% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

4435 readers
132 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Microw@piefed.zip 6 points 3 months ago (14 children)

If you take the timeframe between these two photos and apply a monthly inflation rate of 2.7, you would land at 70,5$ for August 2025. Now obviously either the inflation was higher in some month in between, or the vendor just hiked the price. But the general drift is correct.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

That’s right . . . Big smile . . . Eeeeverybody’s happy . . .

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

As much as it fun to rag on supposedly out of touch economists, this "cheapflation" phenomenon is very documented and accepted among mainstream economists. Like many others in the public sector, government economists have been calling for more suitable and timely measures of inflation for decades, only to have their requests for more funding and support denied as the public service falls apart.

Price discounts and cheapflation during the post-pandemic inflation surge - ScienceDirect - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393224000977

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

That’s not “inflation.” That’s tariffs. And it wasn’t “inflation” under Biden. It was price gouging.

Fuck, I wish some of y’all would read a book once in a while.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›