this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
26 points (96.4% liked)

Opensource

4771 readers
158 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What are your thoughts? Any counter-counter points to the author's response to most concerns regarding open source?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

The biggest growing concern is that many open-source projects are maintained by just 1-2 people, who themselves become targets of capitalists trying to take down such competitors by hacking their accounts. Even GitHub is no longer safe; I now download 2-3 versions away from the latest version of each project and read up on clamor first, just in case.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I don't disagree. I believe if public/government funds are used to develop software, that software should be open source. Same with many of the developments paid for by the government... If we the people are paying for it, it should be open

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Especially in public life (government, etc), open source should be a default. The only exception I can think of is where there is no open source project serving a need but a proprietary one does.

But we need to go further than open source and practice ethical technology. If there is overlap between open source and evils like fascism and genocide*, then we are fostering an “open source” practice that serves the privileged.

*Microsoft, Google, etc