this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

3213 readers
96 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They should never have done it anyway. And AI also isn't particularly new.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

And AI also isn’t particularly new.

Synecdoche is not multiple-choice. The kind we're talking about didn't really exist four years ago.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago

The policy is: don't. No need to rethink anything.

[–] Embargo@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago

My wife and I have been annoyingly militant about this over the past 10 years. A.I. has proven this to be maybe the best decision we ever made.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

As a parent, I already don't post photos of my daughter online. As soon as you post them, you no longer own them. They can be copied, sold and distributed at any time, for any reason. This has always been the case.

AI just makes this issue even worse.

[–] MXX53@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

I’m a parent. Never post photos of my kids online and was able to get my wife to avoid it as well.

Had to have some discussions with the grandparents though about posting photos of the kids online. Thankfully once I explained why they were understanding and now we just keep photos of the kids to shared signal groups between the grandparents, great-grandparents, uncles and aunts.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

the solution is use AI to make phony photos of children that are uglier than your own children and post those as your children.