this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Statecraft

187 readers
1 users here now



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

"Seldom is so ambitious a case filed on so slight a basis," wrote Circuit Judge Raymond Kethledge, noting there are thousands of companies that have manufactured PFAS but just 10 listed as defendants in the case.

How on earth did that happen? It's such a disappointment, but at the same time I understand the judicial system has to follow the law and apply it equally.

Why was the lawsuit so limited in the first place?

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here