Mildly Interesting

21691 readers

1283 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

750

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

177 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 4) 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why does this post read like some kind of advertising bot posted it

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Because we are used to anytime someone mentions a product name, they were paid to do so.

But this is just an interesting and useful government intervention to correct a capitalism-derived problem.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Between 14 and 96 pesos, or up to $5.15 usd

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Waaaat? Keep big government out of my addiction!!!!

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But has 3 seals, what the fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I’d really like to try that

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

My guess is check for people to start reselling it within a few months tha

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

substitute the milk then it'll be cheaper and healthier

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How much lead?

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

For those who don't know: toxins in chocolate.

load more comments (2 replies)