this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
751 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72688 readers
2376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

Capitalism is all about competition unless it's not.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 9 points 9 hours ago

Capitalism isn't about anything other than keeping the ruling class rich and in power. How it chooses to do that has varied throughout time. During the 20th Century the lie was that "American Style" capitalism was fair because the capitalists would promote Laissez-faire style economics ("Free Trade") out of their mouths, while actually building monopolies.

With the rise of Trump-style 'conservatives' Republicans have adopted a new strategy, Mercantilism. Mercantilism doesn't even pretend to be fair or free. The word 'Competition' doesn't even appear anywhere in that article because competition is bad for Capitalists and they see no reason to continue to lie about that. They actively oppose free trade.

Even if 'Capitalists' possessed the ability to feel shame for being hypocrites (which they certainly do not), calling them out for not following along with the principles of 'the free market' does no good since they have abandoned advocating for that a while ago.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Good, let's do it. I'm tired of our tax money keeping shitty car companies floating.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

And no competition. I'm pretty sure that they can shave some of the price off from that massive jump that came with COVID due to [checks list] "supply chain issues" and yet never went back down after...

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But it would also help american people. Which is more important, I wonder.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago

Stop giving them more reasons not to allow it

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 123 points 21 hours ago (24 children)

Oh no! The type of capitalism where we have to compete!

Make it go away, Daddy Trump!

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sadly, I think it was Biden that put a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. Fuck Trump, but come on, Biden, don't do this shit for them. I really like that new Xiaomi YU7.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is not so simple. Blocking BYD has a lot to do with protecting American manufacturing jobs. That's not to say Biden's tariff was the right answer. But it is a more complicated problem to solve than it appears from the perspective of a single car buyer.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago

Sucks to suck, our car companies suck and they absolutely should loose and be forced to fire people if they can't compete. Give me my cheap and decent Chinese cars please. I live in a capitalist country so lets act like it instead of being fucking pussys

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

But the Chinese government could be spying on you if you bought a Chinese manufactured car!!

P.S. for bonus points, does anyone know where most GM automobiles are currently being manufactured?

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 69 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Good. Fuckem. They make shitty, oversized trucks that are a danger to pedestrians and people who drive reasonably sized cars anyway.

[–] Unrelated@feddit.nl 4 points 14 hours ago

The Chinese too know how to make unnecessary large cars, unfortunately.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

My boss in the UK got one. In bright red. It looks like he's driving a fucking fire engine.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, didn’t Japanese and Korean automakers already do that?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Yes. They did. That's called competition. It forces companies to improve by destroying them, except they don't want that. And politicians don't want that, cause it makes corruption unstable.

Killed Detroit too, though. But, eh, helped other parts. It's life.

Thus already in the 90s with the TRON OS a different approach was chosen by US regulators - threaten Japan with sanctions if it's allowed to compete with Windows inside Japan .

They can't threaten China, but they can prevent Chinese competitive goods from entering US market and improving its economy again.

Bad economy - poor and stressed people, poor and stressed people - worse political decisions, worse political decisions - good for middlemen which in our age shouldn't exist frankly. We have the technologies for direct democracy, it's not 1920s.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] funkyfarmington@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Maybe GM could, I don't know, innovate?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›