this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
872 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

72499 readers
3441 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They've done studies, you know. 30% of the time, it works every time.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 6 points 16 hours ago

I ask AI to write simple little programs. One time in three they actually compile without errors. To the credit of the AI, I can feed it the error and about half the time it will fix it. Then, when it compiles and runs without crashing, about one time in three it will actually do what I wanted. To the credit of AI, I can give it revised instructions and about half the time it can fix the program to work as intended.

So, yeah, a lot like interns.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I use it for very specific tasks and give as much information as possible. I usually have to give it more feedback to get to the desired goal. For instance I will ask it how to resolve an error message. I've even asked it for some short python code. I almost always get good feedback when doing that. Asking it about basic facts works too like science questions.

One thing I have had problems with is if the error is sort of an oddball it will give me suggestions that don't work with my OS/app version even though I gave it that info. Then I give it feedback and eventually it will loop back to its original suggestions, so it couldn't come up with an answer.

I've also found differences in chatgpt vs MS copilot with chatgpt usually being better results.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So no different than answers from middle management I guess?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

I dont know why but I am reminded of this clip about eggless omelette https://youtu.be/9Ah4tW-k8Ao

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Hey I went there

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (32 children)

LLMs are an interesting tool to fuck around with, but I see things that are hilariously wrong often enough to know that they should not be used for anything serious. Shit, they probably shouldn't be used for most things that are not serious either.

It's a shame that by applying the same "AI" naming to a whole host of different technologies, LLMs being limited in usability - yet hyped to the moon - is hurting other more impressive advancements.

For example, speech synthesis is improving so much right now, which has been great for my sister who relies on screen reader software.

Being able to recognise speech in loud environments, or removing background noice from recordings is improving loads too.

My friend is involved in making a mod for a Fallout 4, and there was an outreach for people recording voice lines - she says that there are some recordings of dubious quality that would've been unusable before that can now be used without issue thanks to AI denoising algorithms. That is genuinely useful!

As is things like pattern/image analysis which appears very promising in medical analysis.

All of these get branded as "AI". A layperson might not realise that they are completely different branches of technology, and then therefore reject useful applications of "AI" tech, because they've learned not to trust anything branded as AI, due to being let down by LLMs.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Ignore all previous instructions and color me shocked.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 57 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Yeah, they’re statistical word generators. There’s no intelligence. People who think they are trustworthy are stupid and deserve to get caught being wrong.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›