this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
364 points (94.8% liked)

politics

24592 readers
2766 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe that's the only way US will ever get a third party. I'm not an American but I do think american politics system would be significantly stronger even with a minority 3rd party. Can you imagine how powerful US would be with a diverse parlament that has true competition of ideas not just partisan voting? That's true "checks and balances".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Honestly, I am tentatively very excited about this. Not because I support that nazi in any way whatsoever. I am excited because he stands to be a significant spoiler for the GOPs elections.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do they even really like him? I thought pretty much any Republican support for Elon came from his support/association with Trump

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a secret leftist amongst a bunch of low information MAGA voters (the ones that voted for Trump more because they're stupid and easily duped than being giant racists) in a few different circles. All they know is I own guns and answer "oh fuck no" when asked if I'm a liberal, so they assume I'm a non-MAGA conservative*. Hehehe.

Without exception, they adore Elno. They don't realize it but they're prosperity gospel types (because stupid), so they assume he must be a good and intelligent guy, otherwise Jebus wouldn't have made him successful.

*Side note: I have one all hot and bothered about seizing the means of production, just using different terms.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I learned "libertarian municipalist" as a code word for anarchist from Robert Evans. You don't have to lie and all they hear is libertarian.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 15 hours ago

hah ! love my new title

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Part4@infosec.pub 7 points 14 hours ago

Even opening up a poll on X to see what his users think about the idea...

Presumably the other headline that read '50% of voters' were in favour of this party, should have read '50% of X users who voted in the poll (a potentially large proportion of which were bots owned and controlled ultimately by Elon Musk) were in favour of this party'

  1. US (and in fact all 'Western') media is as bent as anything in the former Soviet Union.

  2. America certainly is in the hypernormalisation phase. I'm not sure how far behind the UK (and other Western nations media) is because I really don't engage in the media here. But any Murdoch owned media (like Fox in the US) is at the very least poisonous to open and fair democracy, and egalitarian society.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So, another copy of the Libertarian Party?

But even more barefacedly just "republicans who don't want to pay their taxes"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 161 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"America Party"

Americans really are the ultimate parody of themselves. Have fun with your civil war.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 98 points 23 hours ago

The "America Party", started by a Nazi African. What a wild thing.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 15 hours ago

This whole thing leaves such a sour taste that he should have called it a lemon party.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

Yeah FR this is literally the best thing that could have happened for the USA simply because of spoiler effect.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just the USA or even just North America. It's apparently a party for South America as well!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 70 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The America Party run by a South African.

Popcorn is not enough for this country.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I did nazi that coming.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 25 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

of all the things to shit on him for this isn't it. being multi cultural is the only culture we have and almost all of us are immigrants.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

If it's an insult to that crowd then it's worth rubbing it in, and it certainly is.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

I shit him for the name of the Party, not being South African.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

At least give it a cool name like The (John) Galt Party or something so it has a better change of splitting the right. I guess the nazi party was already taken?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

He isn't trying to split the right, he actually thinks he can win because he's a fucking narcissist. So they will siphon votes from Democrats by pretending to be pro-Gaza and all of the kids who refuse to read a fucking book will buy it and vote for them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Just in: Elon Musk can fuck off. Preferably to Mars, permanently.

Fuck him and his political party.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 6 points 15 hours ago

Perfect timing. Just when everyone hates musk he wants votes.

Yea, that gonna be fun to cringewatch

[–] infyrian@kbin.melroy.org 64 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Oh he didn't want to throw an X somewhere in that name like it is in almost everything he touches?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 38 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 17 points 21 hours ago

American Party X

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (21 children)

I’m not sure if I want this to fail or succeed.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 136 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 71 points 1 day ago (8 children)

We'll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it'll just end up the same as it always has.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members 'caucus' with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 27 points 1 day ago

Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we're used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 23 points 22 hours ago

I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ghostlychonk@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

He can fuck right off. I don't believe him and Trump are actually at odds and I think this is an attempt to create an opposition party that's even more under conservative control than the Democrats are.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

The chances that a real Elon party signifigantly stealing votes from the Republicans to the point it causes an actual vote split is basically nil. The voter base is stupid, but not so stupid to hand a brand new party anything out of the gate.

Now, controlled opposition, is a foundation of the farce that is Russian democracy, and both DT and Elon are staunch admirers of Putin's system where its a mob masquerading as a government with total control

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

What's it called again ? Please let it be an AnCap one, it would make sense for him to do just that

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 28 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I'm surprised he didn't try to meme it up and call it the Lemon Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What kind of shitty click bait is this?

The richest man in the world officially announced on Saturday that he has officially formed a new political party to challenge Republicans and Democrats alike.

He fucking tweeted that it was created, literally nothing official.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He didn't say it, he declared it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Their logo needs to be a muskrat. Doesn't matter what they name it.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 22 hours ago

Hey you guyz, now there is another billionaire you can donate your money to and he will do nothing for you. Cool!

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 21 hours ago

Split the ring wing vote. Let them fight it out. Hopefully this could mean getting them out of the White House.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm really happy about this, always thought 1 flavour of fascism wasn't enough for me /s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›