Technology

72321 readers

2755 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

220

Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upholds a Texas law that requires porn websites to verify that their visitors are 18 or older, rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the law (www.eff.org)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Today’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton is a direct blow to the free speech rights of adults. The Court ruled that “no person—adult or child—has a First Amendment right to access speech that is obscene to minors without first submitting proof of age.” This ruling allows states to enact onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize their data security and privacy. These are real and immense burdens on adults, and the Court was wrong to ignore them in upholding Texas’ law.

(page 2) 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 95 points 1 week ago (5 children)

But there's no such legislation or required identification for my kids to see graphic violence and gore. We're a pretty bass ackwards society.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Australia got the criminals while America got the prudes.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Free speech only applies to saying the N word

-Supreme Court probably some time in the future

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ah, the ol in haec verba Tarantino rule

[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Am I the only one who beleives that it would have been a more effective arguement to try and use the 4th amendment instead of the 1st? Violating free speech is just a weak claim, but "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches..." seems quite relevent here. But I am also not a lawyer.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I thought they just stuck down the one in Tennessee? What the fuck. Sick of these corrupt courts.

load more comments