this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
107 points (97.3% liked)

Factorio

1443 readers
1 users here now

A Lemmy community for the game Factorio made by Wube Software.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

no I did not select the wrong community, I meant for this to be posted here

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Secret Third Option: barrels moved by belt

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Barrels moved by individual flying logistics robots.

[–] Giloron@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is my flame turret strategy.

Bots deliver to the wall, then pipe the length of the wall.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Why not just pipe to one of the wall edges?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Barrels launched to an orbital platform, then dropped where needed

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You are a monster.

[–] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Barrels moved by train. Take it or leave it

[–] guynamedzero@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Barrels moved by bots

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

You like pain dont you?

[–] SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trains. Even if it's a short -ish distance it's still usually worth it to set up the input station so it's easier to add another field later. Plus, trains are fun. Choo choo.

... In all seriousness, looks like an interesting video!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah... Factorio logistics aren't very realistic.

I wonder how a pipeline compares to an express belt system.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

God damnit, I was was seriousposting. I'll just include that below:

Factoriopost: If it is not extremely close to the base, then train as you will almost certainly need more oil later so you got to set that shit up anyway.

Seriouspost: If the goal is to move oil, then pipelines don't require burning even more fossil fuels, have less spills per unit moved, and are much cheaper per unit moved.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the video he makes the point that we shouldn’t be making it cheaper to take oil out of the ground.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

Figuratively speaking, yes.

Also literally.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

But if you build more train infrastructure maybe it can make the cost low enough to convert some shipping by truck to train?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ok but from my really screwed up factory, I purged a giant area around the main factory. So now I need a way to defend all those areas eventually.

I think the only way that's gonna work is going to be train-to-pilpeline at some natural choke points as I start setting up an actual defense perimiter. As I don't imagine my ring of mines is actually going to do much should it come to it.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I am playing Pyanodon's and the meta is to use trains, because it's more space efficient to move a bunch of different liquids by a single rail than a ridiculous amount of parallel pipes.