this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1098 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7555 readers
1909 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I havent seen the Dems fight for much of anything in a long time. I highly doubt they'd do whats needed to make an impeachment happen.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Because the last two impeachments were a resounding success?

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then every president should be impeached. Dem leadership wouldn't pursue this because they know it puts some of their own at risk

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What? Democrat presidents aren't at risk of impeachment? You mean like Bill Clinton?! lmfao and they weren't trying to do the same to Obama and Biden for their entire terms? But they won't do it to the next one as long as Trump isn't impeached for a 3rd time?

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bill Clinton raped his intern

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Correct but Clinton was impeached for perjury and being a Democrat. Republicans are pro-rape.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It worked so well the first two times. Why not try again?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Third times a charm?

[–] EverXIII@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

A sraight jacket would be a better solution.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

He has avoided impeachments with way better justifications, but sure, go ahead.

[–] justmember88@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] ALilOff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If we have to rely on the house or senate to impeach him, that’s not going to happen.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't they dangle an "impeachment" so many times the last time it literally stopped meaning anything? I see thru this game and I ain't buying it.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

For what? For doing what the USA does best?

[–] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Will it even matter?

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This will totally work.

And yes, I know its bait.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›