this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

Global News

6638 readers
178 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oslo (AFP) – Norwegian lawmakers approved Thursday the introduction of a tourist tax to help finance infrastructure improvements as a boom in visitors has led to worries about overtourism.

The law introduces a three percent tax on lodgings, and may also be applied to cruise ships making stops, in areas particularly affected by tourism.

The country registered last year a record 38.4 million night stays, including more than 12 million by foreigners, according to official data, as the country's picturesque fjords attract more and more visitors.

However, public toilets and parking have been overwhelmed in some locations, causing tensions with local residents.

The funds raised by the tax will go exclusively to improve tourism infrastructure.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeN9o@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really don't understand tourist tax, the tourists are spending money just to be there, 12 million tourists? that's 12 million people buying rooms / food / experiences / gifts & memorabilia, why add a tax on that??

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Infrastructure can't bear it, only so many people can fit in one place. Also, a lot of these people, especially on cruise ships, spend exactly zero money at the place they visit, as they have lodgings and food on the ship, and are only there to sightsee.

IDK about taxing lodgings, but maybe there are too many hotels for the place? I'd guess AirBnB made it impossible to regulate the market by controlling the amount of permits issued.

I think a small flat fee is usually better at solving this, as you would need to get rid of the people who visit but don't pay, but that might be hard to implement if you can't close the place off like you can in Venice for example.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

I'd tax cruise ships based on the number of people coming off the ship. Those tourists usually contribute the least to the economy in comparison to visiting sites.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tourism only benefits the owner class. It doesnt benefit the other 99% of the population. In fact it actually takes space and money away from citizens.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

It depends on the location. Tourism does generate some employment; some cities have been built on tourism as a base. The problem is that most tourism jobs are low wage. However, if your region doesn't have any other kind of economic engine, it may be the best thing to develop.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

I touristed in Norway. The ferries don't take cash, so you ride for free.

Kinda stupid of them.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i can understand parking, but people are complaining about public toilets being overwhelmed?

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

It's a real shit show.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

A lot of the trips from things like cruise ships are organised, so a bus load of people will turn up somewhere all at once. Lots of places will have multiple cruises arriving at around the same time, and will have other organised trips too. If the toilets weren't designed for that many people at once, you'll get long queues, as well as needing more cleaning and maintenance.

You could build more toilets and hire more staff, but the money has to come from somewhere. Depending on the area, there might not be anything there that generates money either.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Europeans commoditize humans need to piss and shit. It's one thing US Americans do better than EU