this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1314 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

7223 readers
1597 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone lamenting this needs to check out neocities, or even get into publishing your own website. Even if it's on a "big evil" service like GoDaddy or AWS, whatever. As long as it's easy for you. Or learn to self host a site. The internet infrastructure itself is the same, but now we have faster speeds, which means your personal sites can be bigger and less optimized (easier for novices and amateurs to create). People still run webrings, people still have affiliate buttons, there's other ways to find things than search engines, and there's other search engines than the big ones anyways.

There are active communities out there that are keeping a lot of the old Internet alive, while also pushing it forward in new ways. A lot of neocities sites are very progressive. If you have an itch for discussion, then publish pages on your website in response to other people's writings, link them, sign their guestbook.

Email still exists. I have a personal protonmail that I use only for actually writing back and forth to people, I don't sign up for services with it aside from fediverse ones. People do still run phpbb style forums, too. You'll find some if you poke around the small web enough.

A lot of these things are not lost or dead. They just aren't the default Internet experience, they're hard to find by accident. But they are out there! And it's very inspiring and comforting.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Its not that there is a shortage of these spaces, its that they are not popular. I'm not sure they ever were popular amongst the general public though, to be fair. Personally I think its okay to have a somewhat small community.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes, I like it smaller! Ideally you have a sort of fractal structure of a bunch of smaller, tighter communities, which are also bound up in larger but looser communities. Then you can get the benefits of broad exposure and resource sharing from large communities, as well as the benefits of meaningful individual engagement and respectful kinship from smaller communities. I think that personal sites along with forums and the rest of the Internet really can do a great job of bringing this about.

As with many things, the responsibility ultimately lies on the individual to protect themselves and resist falling into bad patterns. Most primarily, maintaining your small community takes effort, and it's much easier to just be a passive part of a very large community that subsists on infrequent uninvested involvement from many people. It's even easier to be part of a "community as a service" like Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok, etc. where all the incentives behind community building responsibilities have been supplemented with real income or fame. But of course then the people making posts, suggesting ideas, steering trends, managing communities, etc. are all in it for reasons that are not necessarily aligned with the well-being of community members. Hence the platform becomes a facade of a healthy community. Really good community upkeep seems to need to be done out of a love for the community, and any income you collect is to support that, rather than the other way around. But love for a community is often not sufficient fuel to power someone to serve huge groups out of the goodness of their heart, when they don't even know 99% of the members. Not to mention that even if someone really is that altruistic and empathetic, the time and resources become unfeasible. So ultimately, a fractal model or an interleaved model seems to be the only one that could work.

Don't get me wrong. Large communities are awesome in their own ways and have their own benefits. They have more challenges, though. Ultimately the best way to build a good large community is by building a good small community.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago

I always look back to the 1960s visionaries and their charmingly naive ideas about the future use of computers.

I suspect that if they could have seen the actual future they would have become plumbers.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 17 points 1 day ago

Rage bait attention seeking absolutely was a thing back then, it was just severely limited and localized.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 6 points 22 hours ago

We need to just ban advertising. The free with ads model is toxic to humanity.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Why do people never mention anything other than YouTube? DailyMotion is trash now but was around then. Veoh was another good one. There were so many other video streaming platforms before YouTube's reign. Some forums still exists. Before Spotify, there was several music streaming platforms also and I'm not talking about LimeWire. playlist.com was legit before and GrooveShark was the Spotify before they decided to kill it off because couldn't profit. So many cool things before capitalism ruined them (e.g. Skype).

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I think those old forums dedicated to discussions and interests are still there. The internet has been urbanized and now most people live in large cities, but some people still live in small towns in the countryside.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

The fediverse is similar enough for me :)

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pardon me, but Friendster was for friends - Myspace was for tricking people into listening to Nickelback.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Goatse is what killed friendster imo

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

You're the man now, dog!

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

We all lost our innocence back then. We stared into the void, unable to look away. You remember how we all were.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

And napster was for taking naps! Until metallicock ruin it.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

On the early days of the internet, I found a website about a comic I like. I emailed the person who made the website. I told them that I liked the site, and I sent them a game that I'd made (which had nothing whatsoever to do with the comic or their site). They tried the game and said it was fun...

That kind of interaction can never happen any more. Money has ruined it. Scams and monetization, everywhere, making everything into manipulative toxic sludge.

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Internet was even better before 2001. Around 2002 is when paywalls started becoming a thing along with the increased enforcement of the DMCA.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I remember when I first got access to the internet in the 90s and it was mostly forums and whatnot run by hobbyists. Finding stuff was a bit tricky, but Yahoo was largely usable to find stuff. Wikipedia didn't exist, but encyclopedia brittanica or whatever was a thing and worked somewhat okay online. Pictures bigger than a thumbnail loaded like a slideshow on dialup, but text was responsive, and text-based online games were becoming more and more common.

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yahoo search? Alta Vista ftw

Lycos was also pretty rad.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feels like we're all old men whose country was conquered

[–] coronach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

That's a surprisingly good way to put it!

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I'm so old I remember webrings.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Gemini is trying to bring that back.
Although it may not be technically the best approach, the 56k vibe is there.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

The corporations could not get their heads wrapped around the internet at first. They needed to deal with nerds and computer geeks to get anything done. These same people that they had kicked around and laughed at for being useless now had to be brought into boardrooms for product discussions. Then the dot com crashes happened and corporations learned that all of those people were not Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. All of these gave the internet an extended era that felt a bit like the "Wild West". AOL internet was a commercial product that got mauled constantly because it hired average skilled programmers, the really ingenious programmers were the ones developing Instant Message based "punters" and program crashing email "bombs".

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a bit more nuanced. Trolling and ragebait absolutely was a thing, but there was still a certain sense that it was just part of the Wild West nature of the internet. Someone posting racist garbage on a phpBB would be a minor irritant that would catch a bit of flak but be otherwise ignored.

These days it's entire office blocks full of professional trolls armed with advanced analytics, profiling systems and AI paid to push political agendas. And the most frustrating part of it is that despite the fact that everyone knows this to be true, it's still working anyway and we have elected officials of ostensibly Developed countries repeating obvious bullshit they saw online.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

People had thicker skins too and IRC's /ignore was used.
People now whimper over anything and can't seem to know how to block others.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Trolls actually saw themselves as an art from. Everyone else saw them as annoying cretins.

I agree with your comment.

[–] sandflavoured@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It really doesn't need to be this way.

At any time, we can decide to open our own blog for $9 a year. At any time we can choose to ditch algorithmic socials.

If we don't like them, we don't need to use them, and just switch off.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)

you can publish independently, but it's hard to get found. Search engines are cluttered with nonsensical link farms these days :-(

We all found our way to Lemmy, and we can start building from here.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blogger is free I think - though a domain name will cost ya. I've thought about doing this for a while. Back to blogging. Seems so therapeutic.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

take a look at neocities.org

[–] sandflavoured@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Looks very cool! I like the relaxed vibe.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Women used to post sexy photos of themselves just for the joy of getting a few people's attention.

They still do, you just need to know where to look. A lot of them want to funnel you to their paid platform, but some just want some attention.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 152 points 2 days ago (26 children)

It was capitalism. Proves that they would sell to you the rope to hang them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

they would sell to you the rope to hang them.

They would sell you a subscription for the rope nowadays.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Enfors@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Well... the type of stuff we long for are still around, it's just that we don't visit it as much anymore. Lemmy is a perfect example of this - it's around, it's better, but people still default to Reddit instead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 131 points 2 days ago (9 children)

90's internet was awesomer. It was simple and chill and small. We hand-wrote our silly little HTML pages and freely published our email addresses. I once mailed some random person a check to pay for a piece of shareware. They were the true halcyon days of the internet.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I miss <marquee> myself.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There was no better internet than going to college in the late '90s. You go from a 56Kbps modem with hundreds of milliseconds of latency being a GOOD setup, to being directly on a 10Mbps LAN with everybody else in your class. It was right before Napster started and people were sharing entire discographies of MP3s via network file share from their own machines.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Between SEO and Googles own bullshit finding information online feels like trying to find the milk in a supermarket or the exit in a casino, designed to make you pass through as much bullshit that's completely unrelated to what you actually want as possible.

load more comments
view more: next ›