this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1706 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7658 readers
3471 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For a family member of mine, who has lost most of their site, all of this "AI" has been a blessing. The ability to talk to, summarize, and read back info has made a night and day difference with her ability to communicate with the world.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's use cases like this where all the hyper AI hatred loses its appeal to me

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago (12 children)

I don't mind seeing an AI summary of search results as much as I mind sponsored links fucking up page rank. Sometimes it is even nice to see "hey your search doesn't make sense because you've conflated two terms". But I guess I'm in the minority.

Reminds me of early wikipedia when there was a deep trustworthiness problem. Seeing a wikipedia link on a presentation stole your credibility, but it was still a hell of a lot better starting point than grabbing an encyclopedia and asking jeeves until you found a thread to pull.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What i hate about firefox is the fucking wall of links on the home page. It takes forever to remove them, and then they just updated and all that crap is back.

[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I use an extension called Tabliss and set that as my home page. I have it customized so the links to my most visited pages are set up with an icon so it's very clean and minimalist.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I tried it out and in some respects it really is excellent, but it loads more slowly than the native "new tab". So I stick to the native one (having removed much of the default crap, of course; now it's just a 8x4 table of my "quick links").

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah i should just change my homepage to something else, but I'm not on it for more than a few seconds so .. eh

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Takes forever? It's like 2 clicks to remove sponsored links forever.

Unlike edge which likes to switch you back to the MSN landing page and bombarded you with US news articles even though your machine is set to another language in another country each time FSLogix fucks up your user profile.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

They're not talking about sponsored links, they're talking about the "quick links" that take random sites from your history and put them on your new tab page. They take forever to remove because if you remove one it grabs another website from your history and puts it there instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Any time it takes to go down the entire list and click more than once is too much time.

Also:

and then they just updated and all that crap is back.

That's the opposite of forever.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

cogwheel, top right, disable all check boxes you want.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

You're the best, thank you

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have never had FF switch sponsored posts back on after turning them off after first install. It also remembers after a reinstall.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago

Good for you

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Laughs in LibreWolf user

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 4 points 23 hours ago

It'll get to a point where you just have to work on your critical thinking skills and just be a pessimist because everything that's going to be presented to you is just bullshit lies. So just acknowledge that this relationship is adversarial. Listen to other people talk about work cited, maybe dig into the unknown, the abyss. They will take everything away from you. And they'll make you feel bad for being angry. You are the product. There is no escaping capitalism until you're ready to do something about it. At this point it's just the game of cat and mouse and you're getting closer to the corner. Please, I know, I'm super fucking negative. Don't stop doing things. I'm just saying. Half of the battle is being aware.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Accept cookies?

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I actually would be pretty happy if my browser could detect and block ads.

But they put a fuck ton of work in to not only NOT do that, they expend material efforts fucking with extensions and other tooling that provide that functionality.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Blocklists are a much more efficient way to do this, and TBH many "traditional" adblockers are still huge performance hogs. Ublock is an exception in this regard due to webassembly and its explicit dedication to lightness.

Vision models are a pretty good way to build sponsorblock/adblock databases though, and maybe even engineer HTML workarounds automatically. It would be cool if you, say, encounter an ad or a dysfunctional web page, and you can opt-in to automatically contribute a fix with your own compute.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I always assumed adblocks already were first-passing against known-advertizing patterns and then rewriting the DOM on the fly. I'm surprised that a vision model would be more performant given that it's still going to have to adjust the DOM anyways.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’m talking theoretically, heh, I don’t think anyone actually does that yet.

And I am just talking edge cases where existing blockers fail and there’s no manpower to figure out a customization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Well I do, so fuck him and fuck you too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have Firefox on my PC but I gotta say, Safari on my MacBook and iPhone hase been solid. It has, so far, done exactly what the post wants. Safari doesn’t just stay the hell out of my business but it also seamlessly shares tab groups with my phone and that’s super nice, too.

I’m sure there are many more hidden things that I will learn are bad about it after posting this comment but on the surface it has been a perfectly unexciting, simple, and easy to use browser. I didn’t even think about it right away and had to come back to this post because of how delightfully boring it is despite using it every day.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 3 points 23 hours ago

I’m a web developer and I always get shit on for actually loving Safari. I don’t know why it’s a crime to love a web browser that stays out of the way.

If you need Chrome or Firefox-style extensions there’s always Orion.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

As much as I hate Firefox having AI, they really don't have a choice. If the majority of people are already using it and don't give a rats ass, they're absolutely gonna switch to the AI integrated browsers ( chrome, edge, probably safari if they already have AI in it or are working on it, etcetera ).

Firefox is inbetween a rock and a hard place right now. They either not add AI integration and attract less users or they do and risk alienating their current small userbase and becoming irrelevant enough to become unusable because big tech 100% enforces a new web standard that non-AI Firefox cannot handle.

For now, I'm siding with Mozilla on this because I can almost 100% guarantee if Firefox falls, the free web will die in less than a year. No more Librewolf, Firedragon ( floorp w/ Librewolf settings/patches IIRC ), etcetera, because if we're being honest, what open source company/rando volunteer has the time, drive, and money to keep the Gecko rendering engine alive? And that's just a start to keeping Firefox alive.

[–] BorisBoreUs@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

How do I 10x my upvote for a post?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›