Doctor Who Social Club

280 readers

22 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.

Rules

1 Be constructive

All posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.

2 Be welcoming

It is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.

3 Be truthful

All posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.

4 Be nice

If a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.

5 Spoilers

Utilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.

6 Keep on-topic

All submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.

7 Meta

Questions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.

Upcoming Episodes

Date	Episode	Title
05-03	2x04	"Lucky Day"
05-10	2x05	"The Story & the Engine"
05-17	2x06	"The Interstellar Song Contest"
05-24	2x07	"Wish World"
05-31	2x08	"The Reality War"

Episode Discussion Archive

Doctor Who Wiki

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ValueSubtracted@startrek.website

Doctor Who's next series 'written and planned' as insiders vow 'We'll be back' (www.mirror.co.uk)

submitted 4 days ago by ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to c/doctorwho@startrek.website

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh no, what will the doomsayers on YouTube, Twitter and Reddit do, now that the show remains uncanceled? 😂 What I meant to say is, great news!

The (admittedly tabloid) report explains one thing about the fabled Disney money that I'd wondered about:

It is also claimed that if Disney departs, it might not have as big an impact as feared by some fans. This is because a “huge chunk” of the extra budget - up to £10 million per episode - is spent on the technical task of improving the picture quality to a level which wouldn’t be necessary if it reverted back to being a BBC standalone series.

The BBC broadcasts its high-definition shows in 2K picture quality, but Disney needs a 4K image for its streaming service and the additional effects work costs a significant amount.

They spent up to £80M per season to render it in 4K? I understand the desire to preserve the show in the best possible resolution, but that price tag seems excessive under the circumstances.

Edit: I'm now pretty sure The mirror's estimate of 4K conversion cost is much too high (maybe the mentioned sum covers a season, not an episode), and so my own calculus needs to be scaled down as well.

[–] wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No idea if the cost for 4K is actually that high, but you have to consider that filming in 4k instead of 2k means better cameras, better lenses, better lighting, more powerful editing suites and CGI rendering will take double the time, double the power and thus double the money.

Again, no idea if their estimate is correct, but I can imagine that switching from 2 to 4k means a big chunk of money.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Accordingly there are 9 episodes per year.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The budget is £55m per season. DW is one of the biggest earners for BBC Studios, and they’re going to want to output in 4K anyway for future exploitation.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

I'm inclined to agree on all counts, but I also think we're working with a less complete view of circumstances than you assert. By all accounts the BBC is not in a great financial situation, so the difference between 2K and 4K might matter.