this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1024 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23420 readers
2875 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Bill gates is always spending his money eradicating diseases. Maybe he can eradicate this musk disease too

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (7 children)

How many children died because Bill Gates lobbied for the Oxford Covid-19 vaccine to be patented?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Idk how many people have died from Covid 19 vax? I keep taking it and my cock is huge, no other side effects

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Your claim seems a bit BS. It was apparently to have a better distribution and quality.

AstraZeneca claimed not to get profits from the vaccine sales. This seems kind of fair knowing that doses were sold at about $4 USD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford%E2%80%93AstraZeneca_COVID-19_vaccine#Early_development - https://reliefweb.int/report/world/uk-donates-20-million-more-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccines-countries-need)

Unless you're talking about the side effects?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

This. Thank you.

That was a villain level move from Gates. The behaviour of the rich nations towards the LICs over covid vaccines was absolutely shameful and destroyed the illusion of Gates' benevolence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Given that the Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after:

0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sorry? Exactly when did Oxford open source it's vaccine and allow manufacturing by companies other than Astrazeneca?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 154 points 2 days ago (35 children)

Cool story, Bill. Who did you donate to? Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing and coopting government for years? Bill isn't innocent in all this, it's just a good time to blame Elon. Don't get me wrong, Elon 100% deserves it, but that doesn't mean that Bill isn't playing the PR game here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Mmm yes. This is why I Lemmy. This article had so many bots praising him on Reddit. Refreshing to hear something other than boot licking

[–] [email protected] 143 points 2 days ago (43 children)

Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing

The problem is that billionaires should not exist but come on. $80 billion already donated. $7 Billion more just for Africa. Hundreds of millions in malaria research.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2022/11/17/bill-gates-foundation-pledges-7-billion-to-support-africa-health-and-agriculture/

Could he do more? Sure. But attacking someone who is doing a little because he isn't doing more doesn't seem fair.

Years ago Elon said he was disappointed when he met Bill Gates because Gates only wanted to talk about philanthropy and climate.

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

so this is what he meant by eliminated world hunger, by killing them directly or indirectly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's logical: no people -> no hunger.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I really do think it would be fun to compile all of the billionaires in the world and just have them fight to the death in a gladiator kind of rig. Would be awesome.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (53 children)

Remember there are no good billionaires. No amount of "good" they do will ever be enough.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Chuck Feeney is the closest we will ever get to a "good" billionaire. Donated over 99% of his wealth and spent his retirement being only worth $2 million.

load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›