this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
327 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23250 readers
2983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I got this from reddit. In one of the comments I found this about Washington state: Governor Bob Ferguson signed into law a bill that restricts out-of-state military forces from entering Washington. House Bill 1321....

I suggest we write our local governments to enact the same type of law before it is too late.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

send them to the white house instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

The crime’s coming from inside the house

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

So say we all!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yet veterans in comment sections of police shootings say that they have better trigger discipline when they are policing an area.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

They probably do, but that doesn’t mean they are right for the job on US soil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Frack, BSG was good...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Police are the violent arm of the state, the fuck he on about lol? Cops don't protect shit but capitol.

[–] [email protected] 126 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you're not already, I advise you to be white and male pretty quick. This is definitely a prelude to martial law.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also straight, healthy and neurotypical.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And not poor, billionaire would be preferable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

That's the essential ingredient

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have heard that being european and living in Europe is also a good way to deal with the current situation in the US

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Speaking as an American...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right up until the idiot starts mumbling about the "52nd state"....

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

That will never happen, I am calling it now, barring any extreme political change there will be no change in the number of states in the US, especially not one from Europe.

Territories, yeah, I can see that.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

So this is where all those privately owned guns are gonna be used for their intended purpose - to oppose tyranny. Right?... Right?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Incoming onion article: NRA says using guns to overthrow tyrannical government a right, not an obligation

Edit: I don't knows if I should remove this, it is in bad taste, this is a gravely serious thing.

Initially my thought was this is what they'll actually say or something -- kind of dark humour.

I wish all Americans the best over the next several years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Correct, and thanks for asking.

Most of us won’t survive longer than maybe a second or two, at best, but know without a doubt that we’re out there. You won’t see or hear anything about us because it won’t be covered by the suborned media.

All the anti-2a people have accomplished is to help the fascists into power and render themselves helpless against them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All the anti-2a people have accomplished is to help the fascists into power and render themselves helpless against them.

Fascism is here, and the Second Amendment has never once been restricted in any practical fashion. That means that fascism rose to power while everyone was fuckin strapped. Nobody has done shit so far except that one kid in Butler who was a bad shot.

What do you still need so that you'd have been a genuine threat to the world's global military hedgemon? A personal F-15 Eagle?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

This is a fallacy and it’s a stupid one.

What do I need not to die in the first 0.5 seconds? 20 more of me.

One guy with some guns doesn’t last long.

20-30 armed people tend to last much longer barring an ATF vs. Waco deal.

See: those Ranchers assholes who didn’t want to pay to graze their cattle on public land, Cliven Bundy I think was one of their names, or the problematic but still effective in this instance NFAC who proved that if you peacefully protest while armed as fuck, suddenly - like magic - you’re afforded your first amendment rights and don’t get the fuck beaten out of you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol bro what are you talking about? Given that there are few-to-no anti-2a people who feverishly vote far-right I think we can confidently say that they are not helping fascists into power. Unless, of course, we’re saying that gun owners getting butthurt and single-issuing their vote in order to keep their hobby is somehow their fault. Far too many gun owners put their firearms above their fellow countryman and it’s just embarrassing.

“Take my guns away?! Well how about THIS!” followed by “they made me do it” is so weak. Try again.

Context: I love guns as a hobby, even had a restricted license(could also own handguns in Canada) for a bit myself and days on the range were really fun. They’re 100% for fun, and if that fun comes at the cost of putting millions of basically unaccounted for firearms into circulation then it’s not fucking worth it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m talking specifically about all my fellow Democrats who are anti gun, who pass stupid law after stupid law banning guns, restricting guns, magazines, ammunition, and so forth, who are now directly responsible for most Democrats not being armed or proficient with firearms.

I live in a blue state and my best friends who I love dearly have no idea I own firearms etc. because of how stigmatized they are here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

most Democrats not being armed or proficient with firearms.

Is this based on hard data or hyperbole?

I’m guessing I’d fit your definition of a Democrat but also your definition of anti-2FA.

I own exactly one firearm, but I used to own more. I don’t think I’ve ever told any of my friends that I own a gun, even our neighbor who’s mentioned his own multiple times. It’s just not something I feel compelled to talk about unless I’m actually going to shoot it.

After the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings it made me sick to my stomach looking at the semiautomatic military style rifle I had. I got rid of it and all my other firearms, only keeping the first one I ever bought, because it was a gun I had always wanted.

That gun has sat in the safe for the last five years, with a barrel lock, unused. I pulled it out last week, stripped it, checked, cleaned it and lubed it. It’s back in the safe now alongside two magazines loaded with .45 hollow points and six of FMJs.

I’ve even been looking at shotguns recently but I’m not ready to believe we’re there yet.

Here’s the thing though, most of the people I know from growing up are like me. We’re all pretty liberal still these days, we grew up around firearms, learned how to use them properly in gun safety training. Some kids hunted regularly, others would target shoot on the family farm when visiting or at the cabin.

I’m a Xennial though. Maybe our generation beat the Armalite crazy wave. We were all about the .30-06 and distance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That and, in my opinion, the constant villainizing of firearms, to the point that many on the left are outright afraid of guns, or so disgusted with them that they’d rather eat rotten food than own one.

Well, that and constantly telling people that polite protests off in a corner are the only way to affect change. Those were often the same voice.

Of course constantly threatening to take away people’s stuff is going to get a person to vote for the guy saying he won’t take away people’s stuff. But the way those right-wing gun-nuts turned it into identity politics and single-issue voting is totally on them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Probably not, based on the gun laws I’m seeing there.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 day ago

Martial law here we come

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

So local police will now have access to nukes?

Because at this point that's almost the only thing they don't have yet.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Joke's on him - local police have been getting heavy duty military equipment for decades.

I just wish that joke was funny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Ikr? Those ah's already walk around dressed like they're in battle.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

The slippery slope has arrived. WTAF?? My heart is with my American friends who are having to live through this nightmare. My Canadian heart is thankful that we have Carney at the helm for the time being. I’m wishing the best for the Australian's upcoming election (elbows up, mates!). Sadly, the relief from stress of having Carney win the election has been short lived.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, it’s like he’s building his own brown shirt brigade across the country!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

red hats = brown shirts

ice = gestapo

this = ss

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

My understanding is that the washington law has an exemption for troops activated by the president or something. So it is mostly toothless. But it is symbolic. And in this case that is worth something.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Send them to the White House where the frequency and scale of the crimes is the highest

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Crime is whatever he says it is I guess, and includes but is not limited to having the wrong skin color.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about Posse Comitatus?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

That only applies to Title 10 troops.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Laws don't apply to the president and the police.