this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
264 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

If Amazon had any balls, they'd display the cost without tariffs, then the costs with tariffs and use your "I did that" image pointing to the tariffed price.

Hell, every retailer and business should do that.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except Bezos is in that "i did that" group. That was one of the only campaign promises that Trump was sure to keep, since it was the only way he would be able to afford his tax cuts for himself and his rich buddies like Bezos.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Bezos did do that. He squelched WaPo pre election.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

slammed Amazon for reportedly planning to display the cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs next to the total price of products on its site.

Their plan exactly mr. Admiral

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah, I got that lol. My suggestion was to add vegeta's "I did that" image next to the tariff price (like they display the badge for Prime price).

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That puts bezos in difficult position. He got involved personally to censor washington post articles against trump then critisize him on Amazon?

"I did that" is something bezos says to himself everyday

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly someone needs to write an extension that does this.

If I have some spare time and the ability to grok tariffs I’ll give it a stab.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

We will see if he has balls by whether or not he actually does it. Saying and doing are two entirely different things.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This should be in Leopards ate my face for both Trump and Bezos. Bezos paid good money through the inauguration fund (and probably other channels) and got screwed on the tariffs. Trump thought he had Bezos in the palm of his hand and didn't. LMAO.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the only reason I clicked. To laugh at both of these undeservedly rich assholes who thought the other was actually on their side

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's the fun thing about narcissistic sociopaths working together. It's only a matter of time before they will turn on each other.

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Bezos long-term plan is to pressure Trump to back down on tariffs, then keep prices high anyway and keep Trump tax cuts.

The oligarchs will infight, but at the end of the day, normal people lose either way.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

I always want to think the worst of bezos et al but:

If the plan was just to jack up prices they wouldn't make this distinction.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fact:

n. a hostile political act, specifically designed to make Donald John Trump look bad.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure it’s Leopards, but how is Bezos reporting the truth of the cost a hostile act?

This is such a Cluster B personality disorder style reaction. Malignant narcissists lash out at anyone who contradicts or provides evidence against their false reality, and every malignant narcissist constructs a false reality for themselves and the people around them. Classic. Toxic. Definitely a page from the cluster B personality disorder playbook.

I’m no defender of Bezos, but the additional costs need to be publicized.

Truth and reality have a liberal bias.

[–] antisocialite@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

Having several malignant narcissists in the family, it's so true about the false reality. It's a constant pack of lies and gaslighting.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Has anybody told that friggin Nazi mouthpiece that everything she and trump says is a hostile and political act? Not one thing done by this administration has been for the betterment of the American people

It's about trump being better than his daddy and getting revenge.

“Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?” Leavitt asked.

Because Biden didn't affect Chinese inflation? You fucking rubes.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Huh, I guess Bezos is regretting that donation he made to Trump's inauguration fund. Well, let them fight.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Not sure how transparency in the "most transparent administration EVAR" is hostile or political.

Honestly, every vendor should have this kind of transparency. Why shouldn't I know how much donvict is taxing me?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Amazon already walked back this plan. Story should read, "Capitalist only brave enough to stand up to the poors."

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe if Amazon gave our Non Corrupt President just a COUPLE MORE TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in "donations" then they can get an Exemption?

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

My fear is that's the plan all along. The tariffs created such a mess that it is nearly impossible to even follow the law and pay exactly as much is required.

It's possible that the idea is the businesses will get exemptions for cooperating with the government.

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

Imagine being such a psychopathic piece of shit that you would unironically complain that telling people the truth about what you're doing to them is a hostile act.

[–] witnessbolt@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Jeff Bezos is a pussy.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, very hostile to display tariffs prices. Very.

Clown world.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TFW Jeff Fucking Bezos is a voice of reason in this shitstorm...

Should double down and put a goofy orange face saying "I did that" pointing at all the Trump tariffs.

[–] PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

What are you talking about lol. Jeff Bezos is doing the only thing Jeff Bezos does, stuff that's good for Jeff Bezos. This is giant leverage that tells the Trump administration "we have big tools at our disposal if you don't make us happy with whatever economic policies we do end up with". He displayed that leverage, it turned into a news story, and behind closed doors, a shift occurred, likely minor, in the ever-evolving power dynamic between the two pricks.

Don't get it twisted. These dudes and the rest like them will never help us except in the most casually incidental way.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did MAGAts think the guy who made his employees piss in Gatorade bottles would just absorb the cost of these tariffs?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The far right keep comparing this to some kind of effort in the past like WWII and things like "victory gardens".

Thing is - they have not explained to anyone what the hoi polloi are supposed to get out of any of this mess? The idea of shifting the tax burden on the poor and middle class so that supposedly jobs will at some future point maybe possibly, without any kind of plan, will come back here....but the rich will DEFINITELY benefit if income tax is dropped.

But yeah, we are all supposed to plant "victory gardens" and raise chickens or whatever the fuck, because Faux "News" says so. So yeah, dipshits like donvict's Nazi Barbie probably really do think Amazon should eat the cost. You know, for "freedom".

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Trump hates transparency. Hey Jeffrey, how's that's "donation" working for you?

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Greed finds a way to get too big. However, it is self-destructive and therefore short-lived. Greed is so selfish, it eats itself alive till there is one last malignant tumor cell standing, and with him ends the entire disease, sometimes only to reappear a few decades later when old memories have faded and the wisdom wasn't fully taught and/or learned. Like a body fights a foreign body, humanity collectively needs to isolate, acknowledge, and curb the evil of greed. Humanity will eventually evolve to learn this important lesson and make sure this mistake isn't repeated.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't this what he purchased ... I mean, the campaign he donated to .... or, what he voted for?

It's so stupid. Trump yelled "Tariffs Tariffs", people on the left said that's dumb and won't work, people on the right Googled "TF is a TARRIF?" (spelled wrong). Now they are shocked because Trump implemented Tarrifs.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So [does Trump want to] discourage purchasing foreign goods or not?