this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
197 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31112 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"First and foremost, I know -- as a former federal prosecutor and as a defense lawyer for decades – that a person who is a judge, who has a residence who has no problem being found, should not be arrested, if you will, like some common criminal,” Gimbel said. “And I'm shocked and surprised that the US Attorney's office or the FBI would not have invited her to show up and accept process if they're going to charge her with a crime."

The cruelty is the point

[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 60 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even this guy got to turn himself in when he should have probably been marched in chains

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Speaking of common criminals...

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That picture will always look like stable diffusion generated to me.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's specifically intended to resemble Hitlers mug shot.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

This should've been his "AL Capone" moment.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

They want to make an example of her to show how far they will go to get others to fall in line.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

If the most you can muster to defend a judge who didn't want to act as a deputized federal agent for ICE is, "The way the FBI went about this was unprofessional." Then perhaps you shouldn't be interviewed on matters of fascism.