this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyart@piefed.social

2202 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyart@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Fairly rich. Upper-middle class, if you will. The working class lived in apartment buildings in urban areas.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why aren't there any callouts for the actual necessary parts of the house (you know, places where people slept etc.)?

It kinda pisses me off how useless this drawing is for explaining how the damn thing functions as habitation.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bottom left says it’s showing the courtyard.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's showing the whole house (minus the no-longer-existing second floor, I guess). The problem is that it doesn't have lines pointing out the cubicula, even though at least some of them would be visible if there were roof cutaways for them.

Edit: in fact, that room between the "atrium and pool" callout and the "shrine" callout is apparently a cubiculum, but they couldn't be bothered to label it!

https://web.archive.org/web/20160306034506/http://www.stoa.org/projects/ph/rooms?houseid=18

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

To be fair, i don't know anyone that bothers about running around labeling cubiculums.

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where are the bedrooms or sleeping area?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I believe this is just showing the inner courtyard, there would have been more of the house.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

So the title is wrong

Cutaway of a Roman ~~house~~ courtyard in Pompeii