this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

3805 readers
450 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seoul (AFP) – When South Korea's Constitutional Court ruled to uphold the impeachment of president Yoon Suk Yeol, thousands of protesters gathered outside to watch a live broadcast erupted into wild cheers, with some bursting into tears.

"Today is the most meaningful day for me," said Kim Kyung-mo, a 43-year-old businessman.

Friday's verdict brings legal closure to a case that has plunged the nation into monthslong turmoil, kickstarted since Yoon's December 3 attempt to impose martial law on the democratic country.

Suspended by lawmakers, the 64-year-old was also arrested on insurrection charges as part of a separate criminal case. He was later released on procedural grounds.

In the months since, both pro and anti-Yoon protesters have poured into Seoul's streets every weekend as the wait for the Constitutional Court's ruling has worsened the political divide.

"Martial law caused so much pain for many people, and the country was almost plunged into crisis," Kim told AFP.

In their ruling, the judges said that Yoon's actions "violate the core principles of the rule of law and democratic governance".

They also credited "the resistance of citizens" as playing a role in preventing full-fledged martial law.

Hearing the verdict read out was a highly emotional experience for Kim Hyun-mee.

"Tears started welling up as soon as the verdict delivery began, and I cried a lot," the 44-year-old told AFP.

But for Yoon's supporters, his removal -- effective immediately and triggering fresh elections -- felt like a shot to the heart.

"With today's sentence, freedom in South Korea is dead once again," Yi Gun-hee, a 40-year-old businessman, said.

Su Yo-hahn, a 71-year-old Yoon supporter, said he feels there is "no future" for his country.

"I'm not sure how to remain hopeful for the younger generation, given what has happened today," he said.

Outside the court Friday, AFP reporters heard Yoon's supporters shouting death threats to judges after the verdict was delivered.

Yoon had defended his martial law attempt as necessary to root out "anti-state forces" and what he claimed were threats from North Korea.

This has garnered support from extreme religious figures and right-wing YouTubers.

And at least two staunch Yoon supporters died this year after self-immolating in protest of his impeachment.

With tensions running high, the ongoing political division will persist, experts say, as controversial opposition leader Lee Jae-myung is seen as the likely next president.

National Assembly speaker Woo Won-shik said on Friday the verdict "is not a victory for one side or the other", but "a victory for democracy".

But businessman Yi branded Lee as a North Korean sympathiser, and said "the door to tragedy has been opened for the next generation".

"It's clear (Lee) intends to drag South Korea away from being a liberal democracy and towards a socialist, or even a pro-North Korea, totalitarian state," the Yoon supporter told AFP.

Calling the verdict "meaningful", pharmacist Cho Kyung-chool said the country has been "focusing too much on competing and fighting".

"I hope that we can now have politics where we can come together and look to the future together and move forward," the 43-year-old said.

For Kim Min-ji, 25, the past four months had been "desperate" for her and her fellow anti-Yoon protesters.

"I'm so happy and honoured that our efforts have led to this historic moment," she told AFP.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My wife is in a group chat with other moms who have a foreigner husband. There is one who she calls 'very left leaning' who was cheering for it and there is another one who she says she didn't show her leaning before, but that this one cried today and decided that they can't stay in this country anymore because of how this went.

I'm a bit oblivious but I have also heard from my wife similar things about the Lee guy that he is pro China and pro North Korea, my wife leans to center conservatism.

From what I understand the two party system in Korea is even worse than the one in the US, it's really not about trying to fix the problems which the country really has like the demographics and what follows of them, but instead it's old guys only fighting for power, disregarding most other things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's basically a few so called Chaebol families that control the whole country. The politicans are just public facing placeholders.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/business/chaebol-south-korea.html