this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

AskHistorians

1320 readers
12 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There was nowhere to send the prisoners. US states wouldn't take them, and freeing them wasn't an option.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/obama-failed-close-guantanamo

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago

I remember this being the big reason. The US didn't want to let them go, and no state wanted to take them.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Expending the political capital necessary to push it through would have consumed his presidency in the process. It was a matter of priorities within the political reality of the era.

[–] sakodak@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

Or, more succinctly, it was inconvenient.

Also, imperialism.

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

Congress wouldn't let him, iirc