this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
363 points (95.3% liked)

politics

28845 readers
1934 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The line Joe Biden used to put into nearly every big speech — “I’ve never been more optimistic about America’s future” — is a long way from what he says in private now.The line Joe Biden used to put into nearly every big speech — “I’ve never been more optimistic about America’s future” — is a long way from what he says in private now.

These days, multiple people who’ve spoken to him over the last year say, Biden often punctuates conversations with: “You think we can actually come back from this?”

The 83-year-old Biden continues to feel out a post-presidency that may prove to be one of the shortest in history and is already one of the most complicated.

There are days when Biden is heartbroken, indignant or in disbelief about what is happening as President Donald Trump — the man he defeated in 2020 — returned and moved not just to tear down his accomplishments, but to dig in with petty insults like the autopen photograph he put in Biden’s spot in the “Presidential Walk of Fame” installed at the White House.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

God that argument is so disengenuous. It basically comes to "cater to us a vocal minority or we won't play."

You leftists scream about the genocide but what exactly did you accomish? Smugness? Superiority? I haven't heard a single leftist give a shit about South Sudan or Myanmar. Leftists are quiet when it comes to Ukraine. But you're incredibly loud about Gaza... you know, the crater where a people used to live because the crap candidate didn't capitulate to your demands.

Well now everything is fucked, the US has zero creditability, our allies hate us, ICE is officially the Gestapo, and concentration camps are being built.

But hey. Continue the tired ass line about "well we should have had a candidate who was against the genocide."

Fun fact. Historically, when fascists take control, the first ones they try to stamp out is leftists.

But at least you can sleep at night now knowing that because you didn't vote for genocide, you now allowed one to be completed with impunity.

Well done tankies.

Edit: Joe Biden was a fucking pussy who didn't do what needed to be done.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You leftists scream about the genocide but what exactly did you accomish?

What did you reactionary centrists accomplish? You handed us Trump. We gave you the path to winning and you chose not to take it. Its on you.

Well now everything is fucked, the US has zero creditability, our allies hate us, ICE is officially the Gestapo, and concentration camps are being built.

Yeah, your fucking fault dude.

But hey. Continue the tired ass line about “well we should have had a candidate who was against the genocide.”

You couldn't win the election otherwise. Did you actually want to win the election or not? Because it follows that if you defended the candidate while they held an unelectable policy position, you were doing the work to get Trump elected.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Leftists rarely show up anyways. But hey. Continue to shift the blame. Whining and doing nothing is what you do best.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I'm not shifting the blame. I've always blamed fake "centrists" (read: reactionary rightwing voters who wear a blue hat) for losing the election. Its your fault.

Did you want to win the election or not? Because there was a path to doing so: The candidate needed to change their policy on Gaza.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Leftists rarely show up anyways.

Source your evidence liar

[–] devolution@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

Not my burden. Show yours that they do.

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this was any normal election, then I would have supported the protest voters.

The problem was that it wasn’t. Trump is trying to ethnically cleanse Latinos out of America. I knew this was going to happen and I wanted to avoid it.

Immigrants were pleading with protest voters during the election. There are Latinos who protested with them from the beginning that have now gone into hiding. I talked to an immigrant that was begging leftists to care, and they accused them of being for genocide just for wanting their family to survive.

It’s not that I hate leftism. But a lot of leftists are unsafe for POC and women. They are privileged enough to prioritize ideals over safety. I only trust leftists that are intersectional, not those who champion some mythical homogeneous global working class.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This guy gets it. And I'm still waiting for a leftist to acknowledge South Sudan.

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t really expect leftists to show the exact amount of empathy for every crisis around the world. Most people focus on issues that matter to them. Leftists are no exception.

My problem is that many assume they are the absolute moral authority. They don’t view their preferences for issues as being biased, just like that of liberals.

Like, it was pretty clear they cared more about Palestine than immigrants. Fair enough. The problem I had was the way they reacted to those who cared more about immigrants than Palestine.

They told immigrants they were crazy for worrying about Trump. They told them “it would have been the same” under a liberal, which goes against a lot of people’s lived experience. And when all else fails, they just blame the democrats for their failures.

I would have respected Uncommitted a lot more if they admitted they took a gamble that failed. Even though I’m against protest voting, I can at least admire that they stood up for what they believed in. They simultaneously want to be trusted with all the power, and use liberals as an eternal scapegoat for any failures.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This guy also gets it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here I am, you can stop waiting fool

[–] devolution@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And...? So let's see the same amount of Gaza energy on that.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

You seem upset people are worked up about wanting a Genocide to stop in Gaza and it is confusing.

Yes cool, lets get some more energy, why would I not be in favor of more awareness about human rights crisises?...?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

.ml was taking about Sudan until the liberal monoparty decided ww3 (with nukes!) was a great idea!

[–] gravitas@lem.ugh.im -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its interesting how "we told you this would lose" equates to "you will lose because you alienate leftists.

The reality is voter apathy and a majority of the population choosing not to vote because they see no difference between the outcome regardless of who wins.

Democrats will do the same shit to appease Their donor bosses, they just feel a little bit of shame about the means they think justify those ends. Thats why youll never hear libs talking about somthing like abolishing ice, only better training them so they have less collateral damage.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The people who don't see a difference are fucking morons. Biden never invaded any US cities.

[–] gravitas@lem.ugh.im 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Obama was the one who started building some of the camps both biden and trump use to imprison migrants. Tell that to all the people whos relatives they deported.

This is what i mean by no differnce in outcome, because yeah sure the dems are more sly about it, they dont "invade" cities, they let the state governments handle delpoying cops against protests, but they still fund the same agencies with the same agendas, they just have more competency about how to do it without making as much noise.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

You are wasting your time my friend, these people will endlessly perform mental gymnastics to overcomplicate this into being something more than harm reduction.