this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
437 points (99.1% liked)

PC Gaming

14158 readers
723 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The lawsuit aims to "stop Valve from promoting gambling features in its games, disgorge all ill-gotten gains, and pay fines for violating New York\u2019s laws."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This similar thing happened in Belgium and the Netherlands nearly a decade ago.

https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49674333

While the court case was ongoing, the real world effect was that games with certain lootbox features could not be released in the Dutch or Belgian market without restricting its sale to adults. In practice this just meant that game publishers either disabled the feature in the Netherlands and Belgium, or didn't release the game at all.

To my knowledge lootbox mechanics in games are still banned in Belgium

https://www.scl.org/12540-loot-boxes-are-not-gambling-under-dutch-law/

However, in the Netherlands, lootboxes were eventually found to not be gambling. The courts went along with EA's argument that while lootboxes are a game of chance, the game around them is a game of skill. And therefor videogames with lootboxes should not be considered gambling under Dutch law.

Since the US has a similar requirement for something to be considered gambling (that is how people argued in favour of pinball machines at the time), I would suspect that companies that make money on lootboxes will defend themselves against this lawsuit with a similar argument.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Well here in the netherlands I couldn't download the mobile pokemon trading card game. And I can't bet points on twitch either when someone does a prediction. So there are still sometimes restrictions.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I live in Belgium and the law is there, but it seems pretty much ignored. At the time there were some games that were changed (battlefront II 2, overwatch, FIFA, etc...) But it seems like everything after just ignores the law. CS2 still had lootboxes, genshin impact, rocket league, apex legends, league, etc...

[–] crazyduck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

They changed the loot boxes in e.g. dota2 to always show what's in them, the argument being that you're no longer gambling then since you see what you buy. This of course conveniently ignores the fact that the gambling aspect just moved to the lootbox you buy after the one you see