this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

AskHistorians

1329 readers
43 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you’re applying the law as it is written, there isn’t a way to square a dictator within the framework of the constitution. ALL federal power is vested in the elected positions, and ALL remaining powers are reserved to the states. It’s not possible for a non-elected official to have more power than an elected official.

The constitution would have to die for a dictator to exist- as in, people would have to willingly stop enforcing it.

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Ah, like our elected officials are currently doing. Got it.