this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1521 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5899 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world -5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How about... you do what you want with your own money and let other people do the same?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I do. It's just the claim that people aren't personally responsible for where they choose to spend their money is preposterous.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, free will sucks like that...

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What, taking responsibility for your choices?

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Because heaven forbid someone does something you don't like.

People REALLY need to mind their own business. 🙄

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 hours ago

Bro, I'm not denigrating anyone for spending money on Amazon. I'm guilty of forgetting the moral and ethical implications for a short term dopamine rush too.

But I'm not going to delude myself into thinking I had to spend money with them.

My problem is with people using flimsy excuses trying to assuage their guilt for doing something they knew was wrong.