this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk

112 readers
171 users here now

Dunking on Liberals from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives." — Malcolm X

Rules:

We allow posts about liberal behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion.

Sister community:
!tankiejerk@anarchist.nexus

Inspired by !tankiejerk@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/20260225073357/https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/02/19/dont-go-after-the-rich-to-fix-broken-budgets

Apparently poor people starving while rich people have 2 yachts is less morally wrong than 👻Taxing the Rich👻

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Read the article. They’re in favour of closing loop holes and ensuring tax is progressive all the way to the top end (so taxing the mega rich properly) but point out the inconvenient (and true) truths that it won’t raise enough money to fix everything, and it concentrates political power in an even smaller number of people (those who are paying for everything) and encourages a culture of dependency in everyone else.

[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

 it won’t raise enough money to fix everything,

Who says that? Only one way to truly find out!

it concentrates political power in an even smaller number of people (those who are paying for everything

They already kidnap and fuck children, they kidnap other heads of State to disteact from that, they create a Gestapo...

Like how should that it even get worse?!

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Find a political party you like, join it, start getting better people elected. Find an activist group (real, not online), wrestle with the compromises necessary to actually get anything done. Remember - a small group of dedicated people is the only thing that ever changes the world

[–] Dreamchiever@lemmy.world 24 points 11 hours ago

If your title is “Don’t go after the rich”, I’m not reading your fucking article.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

concentrates political power in an even smaller number of people (those who are paying for everything

Somehow rich people paying taxes concentrates power? They already have all the power via lobbying and citizen's united. How the fuck would taxes give them power?

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 10 points 10 hours ago

Literally capital is power. The more capital they hoard the more powerful they are. Taxes redistribute capital.

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The solution to lobbying and citizens united isn’t tax changes - it’s transparency in political funding and the electorate giving a fuck. And, pretty obviously, if most of a governments tax income came from a few hundred individuals they’d have enormous power, even if you did fix the lobbying/citizens united problem- they could just leave and crash your income overnight

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago

Yes... The solution to lobbying and citizen's united is to get rid of them... I was merely saying that was the locus of their power and that taking their money via civic means doesn't somehow give them power. Also, the flight of wealthy people narrative never pans out when tested.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 8 hours ago

if most of a governments tax income came from a few hundred individuals they’d have enormous power

But, currently, those people already have enormous power ... and we're not even getting any money out of the deal.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, the same tired, weak arguments the rich have used to avoid paying for their fair share for decades?

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Hey, show some sympathy! Poor Arthur Laffer's arse has bled non stop since he pulled that curve out of it.