this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
47 points (94.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

15167 readers
872 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I've noticed that Google maps always adds walking time into public transport routes, but never accounts for parking and walking when driving.

I like it feel like this gives the impression that public transport is slower, when 9/10 driving with friends we waste a ton of time parking and walking.

If Google maps and Waze showed parking and walking estimates, it would level the playing field and possibly have a dramatic effect on public transport usage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It absolutely is not a trivial thing to calculate, I expect. Until someone figures out how to use fluid dynamics to do it. But what I'm saying is that parking is similarly a non trivial problem, imo. But maybe they could start with like a heat map of targeted area, and then once that area has been reached, how much longer you hover around said target. And how far you end up stopping the car. Hmm... Yeah okay, maybe it's not that hard and they're just lazy bums I dunno.

That's the thing : estimating traffic time is just as hard if not harder than parking. There's no excuse for not providing a bracket to give people guesses for that, just like traffic delays.

Also the thing about fluid dynamics is that the flow characteristics change dramatically below and above the Reynolds coefficient, and that just shifts the issue : heavily trafficked roads tend to hover really close to it and being wrong by just a few cars or wrongly estimating their agressivity (yeah that changes things significantly) can completely throw off the calculations.