this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

3341 readers
29 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
wolfeh@lemmy.world
54
Why Chains Are Still Better For Bicycles Than Belts (hackaday.com)
submitted 3 months ago by mettwurstkaninchen@feddit.org to c/bicycling@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like the benefits of belts are marginal at best, if you don’t want to buy an expensive belt compatible bike and drivetrain, chains are still overall better for most people from the stance of low cost for your complete setup.

[–] wav3ydave@mas.to 4 points 3 months ago

@Prontomomo @mettwurstkaninchen I find most of the "problems with chains" that belts purport to solve are problems with derailleurs, not chains. Get a hub gear if that's a problem. Doesn't have to be a belt drive one.