this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
857 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

20705 readers
1442 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 334 points 1 week ago (31 children)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (13 children)

The problem in this story wasn’t actually the US this time, it was the Swiss insurance company.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I would say the problem also was a very high medical bill of $ 200k.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

If I'm going to be paying $200,000 for medical procedures then they better be replacing my liver or something. How could a pregnancy possibly cost that much money?

They probably asked 6 grand just for pulling out a splinter.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)