this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
322 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

81709 readers
3752 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
322
Wikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive links (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by antonim@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The English-language edition of Wikipedia is blacklisting Archive.today after the controversial archive site was used to direct a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against a blog.

In the course of discussing whether Archive.today should be deprecated because of the DDoS, Wikipedia editors discovered that the archive site altered snapshots of webpages to insert the name of the blogger who was targeted by the DDoS. The alterations were apparently fueled by a grudge against the blogger over a post that described how the Archive.today maintainer hid their identity behind several aliases.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

GhostArchive came up in discussions.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem that web.archive.org and ghostarchive.org both have is that they regularly fail to archive content

[–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Understandable. Archive.today is really good at getting website content, but their methods are proprietary and a little dubious.

If you just want to save things locally, I believe Single File is really good. It downloads the page that you see on your browser, as you see it.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also, as the name indicates, it downloads the page as a single file. Obviously, it doesn't help for archiving the page for other people, though.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't you host it somewhere yourself? I guess there's a question of trust there, but trust is the reason Wikipedia has decided to stop using archive.today

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I would probably use the Wayback Machine for that. You can give it the page's address and tell it to make a copy.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago

The Wayback machine is good, but it has limitations archive.today subverted. That's why people are looking for alternatives specifically to the latter