this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
88 points (96.8% liked)
science
25363 readers
841 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article fails to make a case that aluminum is even harmful. It talks about the safe limits but that's not the same.
Because whether or not it's harmful doesn't even matter when the vaccines don't even move the needle on terms of exposure anyway.
With respect to the vaccine facet at least. If exposure is otherwise harmful, well that's up to other studies to determine.
Because that’s not the case it is making…
It is the claim made vaccine deniers that the aluminum in vaccines is very dangerous. This study demonstrates that dietary aluminum exposure far exceeds exposure by vaccines. The implications of this study on those claims are left as an exercise to the reader.