this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
228 points (92.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

15036 readers
359 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34367979

More barriers to cycling means more cars which means more dead cyclists. Help us defeat this terrible anti-safety bill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There's also the privacy angle. There should be legal ways to get around without being tracked by license plate readers.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There should also be legal ways to hold motorized vehicles accountable if they plow through crowded sidewalks or drive on roadways while disobeying traffic laws.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but you're talking past their point. You both have good points but yours does not faithfully address theirs.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are currently ways to get around without plate readers. Regular cycling, walking, and most transit can all be taken anonymously, as can most taxis. Once something is motorized there is inherently more risk both to the user and people around them, especially if the user operates it while impaired.

Our arguments are related because there has to be a middle ground between anonymity and accountability. OPs comment could even extend to cars if someone wanted to push it that far.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

An ebike doesn't pose nearly the risk to the public as a car does, it's much closer to being as dangerous as a non-powered bicycle, which is not very. If people fall for the argument that ebikes need plates, plates for normal bikes probably aren't too far off. I don't think it's ever going to be the case that overall public safety is meaningfully worse because cops can't easily track down rogue cyclists as easily as cars, but it's easy to imagine cops having a real time map of cyclist locations being a threat to civil liberties.

A better way of doing it could be classifying them as motorcycles if they are built to go very far above the maximum speed possible on your own power, incentivizing most that are sold to be slow enough that the safety considerations are more or less equivalent. That would remove any small decrease in safety without building up more surveillance infrastructure.