this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
228 points (92.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

15036 readers
471 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34367979

More barriers to cycling means more cars which means more dead cyclists. Help us defeat this terrible anti-safety bill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I dunno man.

A small vehicle, that can rip along streets at similar speeds to mopeds and motor bikes?

I’m very in favour of wider adoption. But carte blanche for any kid or fuckhead to lobotomise themselves or others needs a second look.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

At least you started your comment by making it clear that you don't know.

There are already clearly defined laws and definitions for ebike classes, which are distinct from mopeds and motorcycles.

Its not carte blanche or wild west or any other silly idiom.

The problem isn't ebikes. The problem is unlicensed electric motorcycles.

Ebikes are a good thing. They blow cars out of the water with how much much more environmentally friendly and cost effective they are. Requiring license plates and possibly insurance is a huge disincentive. Also pointed out by another user in this thread is that it enables the tracking of your location by all of these horrible flock cameras.

If kids are ripping along the streets on illegal electric motorcycles, what we need is law enforcement, not new laws targeted at those who already are following the existing law.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think those are all good points except the last one. You do not want cops running down kids on bikes on a hunch that they or their bike aren't compliant with something that can't be accurately assessed from a distance. Good transportation requires a combination of education, infrastructure, and enforcement. In the case of kids using electric motorcycles I think a lot of the first thing with a healthy helping of the second thing are where the focus should be. Teach kids responsible use in school, maybe lower the learner permit age for electric motorcycles use, and get better facilities for non-motorized vehicles so kids don't require a motor or engine to safely travel longer distances.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with the spirit of your post. Entirely.

Yes, enforcement is certainly an issue.

However, here in Ontario any moped that has pedals is an e-bike, legally speaking. I’ve seen one with the most limp-twisted effort to qualify as a bike and be therefore street legal. But it still has all the qualities that cause me concern.

What we need is better classifications. A small standing e-scooter that can’t break 15kph shouldn’t be treated the same as a moped with pedals that can get 60kph.

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

For content, here in California we do have ebike classifications that are a little more detailed than pedals means bicycle. There are three classes, and the fastest (class 3) are not legal for middle school ages. We even have a law on the books that makes it illegal to sell ebikes that can be software/app changes into a different class.

This really is a push to outlaw all ebikes, especially since the resp is from Orinda. They hate bikes there, even regular push bikes.

[–] socsa@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The unfortunate reality is that there is no world where towns and cities are going to spend money enforcing bike laws with dedicated law enforcement. They are just going to ban or heavily regulate ebikes, and this was the incredibly obvious outcome once the fat bike motorcycles became the dominant form factor.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

They probably had a similar attitude when cars first hit the streets. Hell my local cops have bicycles already, how hard would it be to put that unit on an e-bike or even a legit moped to catch up to offenders.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can get fucked up on a bicycle or skateboard too: Should they be forced to get plates?

[–] thebustinater@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because the weight and speed are so comparable...?

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you trolling or being serious?

[–] thebustinater@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

I'd take being hit by a kid on a skateboard over one on an e-bike any day... but you do you

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Bike registration is already required in a lot of places.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. I don’t think so.

You can get fucked up walking. You can get fucked up standing still. You can get fucked up while asleep in your bed.

The difference is the risk of getting fucked up, being fucked up by someone else and the amount of fucking up a given tier of activity presents.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

I think its fine to have a difference for emoto vs ebike vs moped, but lumping electric bicycles in general with them is bullshit.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes. Including passing a hard civics test, no retries. And keep them off the fucking sidewalks.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe give them a fucking safe, usable bike path?

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Well, yes, obviously. But if there isn't one they stay out of the city, with the rest of the dangerous machinery, not on the sidewalk with the civilised people.

[–] freehand8776@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago

Yeah. I have to agree. The amount of e-bikes that decide what rules to follow at the drop of a hat is way to high. Oh, light is red, but walk lane says go? Jumps in cross walk and nearly runs over everyone. Oh theres a turn signal at a traffic light? Jumps from sidewalk to turn lane.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The solution to the world's problems is less people not more people, if idiots want to lobotomize themselves by being a idiot on a scooter then that's all the better for society

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

And they people they harm in the process?