this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
744 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
5574 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety.

All businesses are. That's what a business is. A legal entity that seeks to extract as much wealth from people as possible. They put profits before people as a matter of policy.

Limited liability corporations should be outlawed.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not what business is inherently; that's what capitalism is.

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's not even strictly what capitalism is about. It's some stupid bullshit interpretation that came out of the University of Chicago economics department.

Seriously, go look at Adam Smiths wealth of nations. The only mention of the "invisible hand" is so different from what is taught in economics now

… by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.

It's not that we need no regulation. It's just trying to say that if we set things up correctly, we don't need to worry about people pursuing SOLELY their own personal gain. Because the market seeks out the "greatest value", which is not just about money. It's also the value to society as a whole.

Instead, we got the fucking bullshit from Chicago saying that the only / best way of measuring value is by profit.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Spot on. I wrote an essay on this exact topic

[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's kind of funny how Adam Smith saw the need for moral philosophy to constrain greed in the economics of capitalism yet for most modern capitalists, capitalism is their moral philosophy 🤣

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Interestingly its not.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe that's only if you're publicly traded.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Even then the legal requirement is about working in the companies interest, not strictly get more profit. It's become shorthand to just say profit, because it's a simple thing to point at.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but it might depend on the company bylaws even if its privately owned.