this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
770 points (99.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8888 readers
911 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just read the paper (well, skimmed is more honest). They cite 5 human trials. The first study was not blind, and it also did not show a difference between the control group and the treatment group. The "mini-review" author made it seem like there was an improvement to the honey group over the control, but this was not the case.

The second study, I can't access. The conditions were a bit more complicated, so I can't fully assess, but the "mini-review" author notes that they were also treated with olive oil and corticosteroids. Also, the group sizes were tiny (11 people split into 3 groups), which makes me highly suspicious of any statistically relevant effects. There's also no placebo.

The third study seems legit from a quick skim. They placebo controlled with flavored corn syrup. At the end of the study, the treatment group does not have a significantly different symptom score than the placebo group. The fact that both groups improve is again misinterpreted by the "mini-review" author. In their defense, the authors of that third study really wordsmith their abstract to make it read that way.

The forth and fifth study both show no improvement due to the treatment.

So 4/5 studies show no improvement over control/placebo, and the 5th study i can't read.

I did find a randomized, controlled study on birch honey which seems good, and it shows an improvement over a regular honey control. That's not in the minireview.

Overall, if there's 4 studies saying no, 1 saying yes, and 1 inconclusive, I'm going to take that as a no.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago

You ignored that the studies were all for different allergies… so you can’t just take 4 “nos” and 1 “yes” as a no for all.