this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
698 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

11080 readers
2423 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what? Who fucking cares if he qualifies for sainthood, as if we, and especially you, would be in a position to judge that. As I said, with the worst people in the world feeding us the opinions on their purity.

As if we didn't need allies, had won, and were arrogantly dispensing retribution like after world war 1. We need all the allies we can get, no one is perfect, and we aren't in a position to judge their character effectively. Let's work with everyone that agrees with us on an issue, and not reject help we can't win without because someone tells us they are a bad person.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you keep babbling about "purity"? This is not about purity, it's about basic decency and that is sorely lacking in every single GOP member, including Massie. If you want to sing his praises go right ahead, but don't expect everyone else to sing harmony.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I already explained, you didn't address my points, just repeated your condemnations of his character, and therefore unwillingness to work with him, because he lacks the decency you crave, a decency sorely from everyone in congress.

Am I supposed to repeat my point for a third time to your use of emotion and slander to obscure the issue? We couldn't work with anyone by your standards, not most of the democrats if led to look at their failings either. I am suspicious at this point, as you haven't answered my point and just continued to manipulate people with your ad hominem arguments, that you aren't working for/with the right wing, with maga to attack anyone that defects from their party.

We were flooded by those accounts after MTG, and lo and behold, the same arguments surface. If called on it, not answering with a reasoned argument for why we should spurn the help of people we need and further make it more difficult to get future defectors, but rather personal insults and slander.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

therefore unwillingness to work with him, because he lacks the decency you crave, a decency sorely from everyone in congress.

Where did you come up with this?

I never said anything at all about working with Massie, only commented on the content of his character and his clearly stated motives. You are making obviously false assumptions and then demanding I respond to your assumptions. That's not going to happen.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How very convenient all the members of the GOP that reject their party and defect get the special not pure enough treatment from those that are led to attack them. Great use of your time and energy, doing Israel's work for them. It totally doesn't speak to your understanding of the situation. /s

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Lol - You have decided you know exactly what I mean while completely ignoring what I've actually written. When called out you actually double-down and again demand a response to your assumptions - as if they have anything to do with me. You're obviously not firing on all cylinders and not worth any further time or energy.