this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
827 points (98.6% liked)

World News

53875 readers
2126 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 99 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

"To shoot her through the chest whilst she was standing would have required him to have been pointing the gun at his daughter, without checking for bullets, and pulling the trigger," the coroner said. "I find these actions to be reckless."

Whoopsies! I usually make sure not to pull the trigger when casually pointing a loaded gun at a family member's chest. But that's just me being overly cautious.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I am baffled at how this doesn't constitute premeditated murder. They had some argument and then guy's like "know what? I know what I'm gonna do." And did it. What freaking horror.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You missed the part where the guy said he didn't mean to do that and he's sorry.

[–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“Jesus says to forgive…”

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That is the crux of Christianity and the crutch of Christian morality.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, well, Jesus will render unto you what is Jesus' forgiveness. Until then, Caesar will render unto you a prison sentence.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just accidentally beat my daughter to death. The bat just went off on it's own. I was just showing her the bat then all of a sudden she was bludgeoned to death. I have no idea what happened!

[–] magikmw@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Obviously a SIG baseball bat.

[–] classic@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

not your fault. she was probably just too observant

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well glocks don’t have safeties and require you to pull the trigger to disassemble. Negligent discharges when trying to show them off to people absolutely do happen, and with how you have to hold the gun to take it apart the “don’t point at anything you don’t wish to shoot” rule gets overlooked a lot.

They’re the default “modern” handgun but I’ve always said they are a terrible design.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Finally, a fellow Glock hater!

Two things that should be completely unacceptable in a modern firearm:

  • Having no safety mechanism whatsoever. (Trigger dingus doesn't count.)

  • Requiring a trigger pull (or even putting your finger inside the trigger guard) for any other reason than intending to fire a shot.

And there are so many excellent modern pistols out there that don't break these two rules. Pistols that do everything a Glock can do, but without these glaring safety issues. So why is the Glock still the 'default' choice? It's especially egregious to see it as a recommendation to novice shooters. Dealing with these safety issues should require an expert. Putting a gun with these issues into the hands of a new shooter is just asking for trouble.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A safety exists to prevent human error. Not touching the trigger doesn’t solve this.

The primary argument of “you might forget to disengage it in the heat of the moment” is complete bullshit. If you can’t reliably disengage a safety you can’t reliably not pull the trigger during a draw, shooting yourself in the femoral artery or hand. Either you practice your draw until it’s muscle memory or you don’t, removing safety features to simplify the process doesn’t make you safer.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The primary argument of “you might forget to disengage it in the heat of the moment” is complete bullshit.

Even if you are in that (rather misguided) camp, there are better alternatives. Specifically, a grip safety. Safety automatically disengaged as long as you're holding the gun properly. Can't 'forget' to do that!

And, yes, there are good, modern designs that use grip safeties. The Springfield XD line, for example. (Those models also require a trigger pull for disassembly, though. Is it that hard to include some kind of decocker?)

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I’m a fan of grip safeties but I still want some form of manual switch I can use to render the gun safe. I honestly think that the FN Five seveN is the best solution but standard 1911 thumb safety (or an HK version with decocker) does the job just fine.